Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HHHTX vs RNWBX
HHHTX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HHHTX vs RNWBX
Hartford Schroders Emerging Mkts Eq R5
Price$22.80
Change+$0.25 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.27B
American Funds New World R2
Price$91.60
Change+$0.67 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.7B
HHHTX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HHHTX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HHHTX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. HHHTX (6.27B). HHHTX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HHHTX (0.92) vs RNWBX (0.12). HHHTX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HHHTX (9 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than HHHTX (1.08). HHHTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). HHHTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: HHHTX (0) vs RNWBX (250). HHHTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.21 vs. RNWBX (15.85). HHHTX return over 5 years is better than : 32.80 vs. RNWBX (24.94).
| HHHTX | RNWBX | HHHTX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.67 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.67 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.547 | 24.541 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.27B | 74.7B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.12 | 764% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.21 | 15.85 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.06 | 57.23 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.80 | 24.94 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 84.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers