Ad is loading...
HHHYX vs RNWHX
HHHYX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts HHHYX vs RNWHX
Hartford Schroders Emerging Mkts Eq Y
Price$17.12
Change+$0.16 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.26B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$77.82
Change+$0.84 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.47B
HHHYX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HHHYX vs. RNWHX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HHHYX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 61.5B vs. HHHYX (5.26B). HHHYX (1.17) and RNWHX (1.12) have matching dividends . HHHYX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: HHHYX (9 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). HHHYX (1.07) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). HHHYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HHHYX: RNWHX (250) vs HHHYX (250000). HHHYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.66 vs. RNWHX (2.65). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 39.59 vs. HHHYX (33.82).
| HHHYX | RNWHX | HHHYX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.72 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.72 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.193 | 2.368 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 250 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.26B | 61.5B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.12 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.66 | 2.65 | 251% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.62 | 13.21 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.82 | 39.59 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...