HI
Price
$30.48
Change
+$0.22 (+0.73%)
Updated
Feb 25, 11:26 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.53B
70 days until earnings call
MMM
Price
$146.03
Change
+$0.54 (+0.37%)
Updated
Feb 25, 11:32 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
58.7B
63 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HI vs MMM

Header iconHI vs MMM Comparison
Open Charts HI vs MMMBanner chart's image
Hillenbrand
Price$30.48
Change+$0.22 (+0.73%)
Volume$600
Capitalization3.53B
3M
Price$146.03
Change+$0.54 (+0.37%)
Volume$200
Capitalization58.7B
HI vs MMM Comparison Chart
Loading...
HI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HI vs. MMM commentary
Feb 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HI is a StrongBuy and MMM is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 25, 2025
Stock price -- (HI: $30.26)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • HI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MMM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MMM is a better buy in the short-term than HI.

Price Growth

HI (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -13.12% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

HI is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (-2.86% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MMM($58.7B) has a higher market cap than HI($3.53B). HI has higher P/E ratio than MMM: HI (34.82) vs MMM (10.77). MMM YTD gains are higher at: 13.253 vs. HI (-1.689). HI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 437M vs. MMM (-6.76B). MMM has more cash in the bank: 5.99B vs. HI (198M). HI has less debt than MMM: HI (2.13B) vs MMM (16.9B). MMM has higher revenues than HI: MMM (32.7B) vs HI (2.94B).
HIMMMHI / MMM
Capitalization3.53B58.7B6%
EBITDA437M-6.76B-6%
Gain YTD-1.68913.253-13%
P/E Ratio34.8210.77323%
Revenue2.94B32.7B9%
Total Cash198M5.99B3%
Total Debt2.13B16.9B13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HI vs MMM: Fundamental Ratings
HI
MMM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6271
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8255
SMR RATING
1..100
9213
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
796
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HI's Valuation (20) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is significantly better than the same rating for MMM (92) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that HI’s stock grew significantly faster than MMM’s over the last 12 months.

MMM's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as HI (82) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that MMM’s stock grew similarly to HI’s over the last 12 months.

MMM's SMR Rating (13) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for HI (92) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that MMM’s stock grew significantly faster than HI’s over the last 12 months.

MMM's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HI (79) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that MMM’s stock grew somewhat faster than HI’s over the last 12 months.

HI's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is significantly better than the same rating for MMM (96) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that HI’s stock grew significantly faster than MMM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HIMMM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNRCX41.49N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Energy C
VMIAX99.44N/A
N/A
Vanguard Materials Index Admiral
CBSLX25.73N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders R
RTDCX15.64-0.08
-0.51%
Russell Inv Multifactor US Equity C
RICHX59.00-0.34
-0.57%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer R5E

HI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HI has been loosely correlated with WTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HI jumps, then WTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HI
1D Price
Change %
HI100%
-2.04%
WTS - HI
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
THR - HI
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
KAI - HI
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.30%
ITT - HI
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
RRX - HI
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
More

MMM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMM has been loosely correlated with IIIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMM jumps, then IIIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMM
1D Price
Change %
MMM100%
+0.34%
IIIN - MMM
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
GFF - MMM
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.53%
HON - MMM
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
TRC - MMM
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.70%
WOR - MMM
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
More