Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HIBCX vs RWMFX
HIBCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts HIBCX vs RWMFX
Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS IB
Price$50.19
Change-$0.36 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.73B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.35
Change-$0.38 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.3B
HIBCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HIBCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIBCX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. HIBCX (3.73B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than HIBCX: RWMFX (1.43) vs HIBCX (0.50). HIBCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: HIBCX (28 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). HIBCX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). HIBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). HIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: HIBCX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.42 vs. HIBCX (-2.51). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 56.65 vs. HIBCX (15.68).
| HIBCX | RWMFX | HIBCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.31 | 297% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.31 | 297% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.269 | 9.070 | -25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.73B | 207B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.43 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.51 | 5.42 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.04 | 45.07 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.68 | 56.65 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.91 | 93.54 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers