Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HIBCX vs RWMFX
HIBCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts HIBCX vs RWMFX
Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS IB
Price$50.41
Change-$0.29 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.67B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.02
Change-$0.23 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.42B
HIBCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HIBCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIBCX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. HIBCX (3.67B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than HIBCX: RWMFX (1.41) vs HIBCX (0.48). HIBCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: HIBCX (28 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). HIBCX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). HIBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). HIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: HIBCX (0) vs RWMFX (250). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.02 vs. HIBCX (-4.57). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.78 vs. HIBCX (4.92).
| HIBCX | RWMFX | HIBCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.31 | 297% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.31 | 297% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.979 | 8.527 | -23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.67B | 204B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 1.41 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.57 | 4.02 | -114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.61 | 29.47 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.92 | 43.78 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.94 | 72.15 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers