Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HICOX vs WNTFX
HICOX vs WNTFX Comparison
Open Charts HICOX vs WNTFX
Colorado BondShares A Tax-Exempt
Price$8.98
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95B
Weitz Nebraska Tax Free Income
Price$9.85
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.78M
HICOX vs WNTFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HICOX vs. WNTFX commentary
Dec 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HICOX is a Hold and WNTFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HICOX has more cash in the bank: 1.95B vs. WNTFX (20.8M). HICOX pays higher dividends than WNTFX: HICOX (5.26) vs WNTFX (2.15). HICOX was incepted earlier than WNTFX: HICOX (39 years) vs WNTFX (19 years). WNTFX (1.22) is less costly to investors than HICOX (0.60). HICOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 5.58 vs. WNTFX (2.00). HICOX has a lower initial minimum investment than WNTFX: HICOX (500) vs WNTFX (2500). WNTFX (3.79) and HICOX (3.75) have marching annual gain over last year. HICOX return over 5 years is better than : 21.02 vs. WNTFX (4.91).
| HICOX | WNTFX | HICOX / WNTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.46 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.22 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.007 | 4.297 | 117% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 2500 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.95B | 20.8M | 9,356% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.26 | 2.15 | 244% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.75 | 3.79 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.57 | 10.02 | 205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.02 | 4.91 | 428% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.12 | 14.13 | 362% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement