Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HICOX vs WNTFX
HICOX vs WNTFX Comparison
Open Charts HICOX vs WNTFX
Colorado BondShares A Tax-Exempt
Price$8.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.88B
Weitz Nebraska Tax Free Income
Price$9.79
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.43M
HICOX vs WNTFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HICOX vs. WNTFX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HICOX is a Hold and WNTFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HICOX has more cash in the bank: 1.88B vs. WNTFX (20.4M). HICOX pays higher dividends than WNTFX: HICOX (5.43) vs WNTFX (2.11). HICOX was incepted earlier than WNTFX: HICOX (38 years) vs WNTFX (19 years). WNTFX (1.22) is less costly to investors than HICOX (0.60). HICOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 5.58 vs. WNTFX (2.00). HICOX has a lower initial minimum investment than WNTFX: HICOX (500) vs WNTFX (2500). HICOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.54 vs. WNTFX (3.27). HICOX return over 5 years is better than : 20.51 vs. WNTFX (4.89).
| HICOX | WNTFX | HICOX / WNTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.46 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.22 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.807 | 3.662 | 77% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 2500 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.88B | 20.4M | 9,235% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.43 | 2.11 | 257% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.54 | 3.27 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.78 | 10.04 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.51 | 4.89 | 419% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.29 | 13.34 | 370% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement