Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HICOX vs WNTFX
HICOX vs WNTFX Comparison
Open Charts HICOX vs WNTFX
Colorado BondShares A Tax-Exempt
Price$8.95
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
Weitz Nebraska Tax Free Income
Price$9.80
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.63M
HICOX vs WNTFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HICOX vs. WNTFX commentary
Oct 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HICOX is a Hold and WNTFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HICOX has more cash in the bank: 1.91B vs. WNTFX (20.6M). HICOX pays higher dividends than WNTFX: HICOX (5.33) vs WNTFX (2.17). HICOX was incepted earlier than WNTFX: HICOX (38 years) vs WNTFX (19 years). WNTFX (1.22) is less costly to investors than HICOX (0.60). HICOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 5.58 vs. WNTFX (2.00). HICOX has a lower initial minimum investment than WNTFX: HICOX (500) vs WNTFX (2500). HICOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.10 vs. WNTFX (3.27). HICOX return over 5 years is better than : 21.30 vs. WNTFX (5.09).
| HICOX | WNTFX | HICOX / WNTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.46 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.22 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.807 | 3.662 | 104% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 2500 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.91B | 20.6M | 9,291% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.33 | 2.17 | 246% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.10 | 3.27 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.67 | 11.81 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.30 | 5.09 | 419% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.61 | 13.44 | 377% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement