It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HIHO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMLI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HIHO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
HIHO (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а -4.49% price change this week, while MLI (@Metal Fabrication) price change was -4.43% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was -5.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.15%.
HIHO is expected to report earnings on Oct 10, 2024.
MLI is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.
The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
HIHO | MLI | HIHO / MLI | |
Capitalization | 7.97M | 8.21B | 0% |
EBITDA | -606K | 874M | -0% |
Gain YTD | -7.179 | -6.354 | 113% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 14.95 | - |
Revenue | 7.35M | 3.77B | 0% |
Total Cash | 5.24M | 1.06B | 0% |
Total Debt | 984K | 33.8M | 3% |
HIHO | MLI | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 46 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 40 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HIHO's Valuation (4) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLI (46) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that HIHO’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLI’s over the last 12 months.
MLI's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Metal Fabrication industry is significantly better than the same rating for HIHO (83) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that MLI’s stock grew significantly faster than HIHO’s over the last 12 months.
MLI's SMR Rating (40) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HIHO (93) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that MLI’s stock grew somewhat faster than HIHO’s over the last 12 months.
MLI's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as HIHO (72) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that MLI’s stock grew similarly to HIHO’s over the last 12 months.
MLI's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as HIHO (34) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that MLI’s stock grew similarly to HIHO’s over the last 12 months.
HIHO | MLI | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 2 days ago60% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago62% | 2 days ago56% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% | 2 days ago55% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago55% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago75% | 3 days ago70% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago60% | 5 days ago55% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago77% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago62% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
TECS | 72.84 | 12.08 | +19.88% |
Direxion Daily Technology Bear 3X ETF | |||
EIDO | 15.88 | -0.45 | -2.76% |
iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF | |||
MUSQ | 23.96 | -0.83 | -3.36% |
MUSQ Global Music Industry Idx ETF | |||
CATH | 65.00 | -3.22 | -4.72% |
Global X S&P 500® Catholic Values ETF | |||
DFAS | 56.70 | -4.18 | -6.87% |
Dimensional US Small Cap ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that HIHO and ZKIN have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HIHO and ZKIN's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HIHO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HIHO | 100% | +0.56% | ||
ZKIN - HIHO | 20% Poorly correlated | -4.00% | ||
MLI - HIHO | 20% Poorly correlated | -6.69% | ||
STLD - HIHO | 13% Poorly correlated | -8.87% | ||
RS - HIHO | 13% Poorly correlated | -6.32% | ||
MSB - HIHO | 10% Poorly correlated | -4.10% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLI has been loosely correlated with MTUS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLI jumps, then MTUS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLI | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MLI | 100% | -6.69% | ||
MTUS - MLI | 51% Loosely correlated | -10.47% | ||
ESAB - MLI | 50% Loosely correlated | -8.37% | ||
ZEUS - MLI | 49% Loosely correlated | -8.84% | ||
IIIN - MLI | 47% Loosely correlated | -6.53% | ||
CODI - MLI | 45% Loosely correlated | -6.49% | ||
More |