It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HINKF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKNBWF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HINKF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KNBWF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
HINKF (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а -0.06% price change this week, while KNBWF (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was -0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.24%.
The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.
HINKF | KNBWF | HINKF / KNBWF | |
Capitalization | 44.7B | 11.8B | 379% |
EBITDA | 6.18B | 351B | 2% |
Gain YTD | 9.168 | 2.943 | 311% |
P/E Ratio | 20.71 | 30.21 | 69% |
Revenue | 29.2B | 2.26T | 1% |
Total Cash | 2.07B | 146B | 1% |
Total Debt | 17.6B | 727B | 2% |
HINKF | KNBWF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 49 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KNBWF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as HINKF (28). This means that KNBWF’s stock grew similarly to HINKF’s over the last 12 months.
KNBWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HINKF (100). This means that KNBWF’s stock grew similarly to HINKF’s over the last 12 months.
KNBWF's SMR Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HINKF (96). This means that KNBWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HINKF’s over the last 12 months.
KNBWF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as HINKF (80). This means that KNBWF’s stock grew similarly to HINKF’s over the last 12 months.
KNBWF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HINKF (94). This means that KNBWF’s stock grew significantly faster than HINKF’s over the last 12 months.
HINKF | KNBWF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago47% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago18% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago45% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago46% | 2 days ago25% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago51% | 2 days ago17% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago55% | 2 days ago10% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 27 days ago44% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago46% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago14% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HINKF has been loosely correlated with HEINY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HINKF jumps, then HEINY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HINKF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HINKF | 100% | N/A | ||
HEINY - HINKF | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
HKHHY - HINKF | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
HKHHF - HINKF | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.22% | ||
PDRDF - HINKF | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.29% | ||
CABGY - HINKF | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.08% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that KNBWF and HINKF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KNBWF and HINKF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KNBWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
KNBWF | 100% | N/A | ||
HINKF - KNBWF | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
HEINY - KNBWF | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.83% | ||
HKHHY - KNBWF | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.92% | ||
KNBWY - KNBWF | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
HKHHF - KNBWF | 2% Poorly correlated | +2.22% | ||
More |