It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HINOY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTYIDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HINOY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TYIDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
HINOY (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а +21.93% price change this week, while TYIDF (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was -1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.26%.
HINOY is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.
HINOY | TYIDF | HINOY / TYIDF | |
Capitalization | 2.32B | 22.6B | 10% |
EBITDA | -69.05B | 535B | -13% |
Gain YTD | -0.249 | -10.430 | 2% |
P/E Ratio | 32.36 | 15.17 | 213% |
Revenue | 1.5T | 3.38T | 44% |
Total Cash | 83.2B | 628B | 13% |
Total Debt | 270B | 1.7T | 16% |
HINOY | TYIDF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 92 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 74 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TYIDF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as HINOY (30). This means that TYIDF’s stock grew similarly to HINOY’s over the last 12 months.
TYIDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as HINOY (100). This means that TYIDF’s stock grew similarly to HINOY’s over the last 12 months.
TYIDF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HINOY (100). This means that TYIDF’s stock grew significantly faster than HINOY’s over the last 12 months.
HINOY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as TYIDF (74). This means that HINOY’s stock grew similarly to TYIDF’s over the last 12 months.
TYIDF's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as HINOY (97). This means that TYIDF’s stock grew similarly to HINOY’s over the last 12 months.
HINOY | TYIDF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago47% | 2 days ago48% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago33% | 2 days ago52% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago29% | 2 days ago38% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago42% | 2 days ago32% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago27% | 2 days ago37% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago27% | 2 days ago37% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago17% | 2 days ago50% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago36% | 2 days ago49% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HINOY has been loosely correlated with AUHEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HINOY jumps, then AUHEF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HINOY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HINOY | 100% | N/A | ||
AUHEF - HINOY | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
TYIDF - HINOY | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ZLIOY - HINOY | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
KIGRY - HINOY | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.17% | ||
EXXRF - HINOY | 3% Poorly correlated | -2.93% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that TYIDF and TEX have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TYIDF and TEX's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TYIDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TYIDF | 100% | N/A | ||
TEX - TYIDF | 24% Poorly correlated | -3.19% | ||
HINOY - TYIDF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
IVCGF - TYIDF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.70% | ||
MTW - TYIDF | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.74% | ||
EXXRF - TYIDF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.11% | ||
More |