Advertisement
HIPS vs MFIC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIPS is a Hold and MFIC is a Hold.
MFIC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HIPS | MFIC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 1 day ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 57% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AEMMX | 13.82 | N/A | N/A |
| American Century Emerging Markets A | |||
| GEGTX | 86.58 | N/A | N/A |
| Columbia Cornerstone Growth Inst | |||
| LSOFX | 18.43 | N/A | N/A |
| LS Opportunity Fund Institutional Class | |||
| EMQAX | 9.86 | N/A | N/A |
| Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Eq A | |||
| QTELX | 13.13 | -0.06 | -0.45% |
| AQR Emerging Multi-Style II I | |||
HIPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIPS has been closely correlated with FDUS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HIPS jumps, then FDUS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HIPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIPS | 100% | +0.44% | ||
| FDUS - HIPS | 78% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| MFIC - HIPS | 76% Closely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| ARCC - HIPS | 75% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| BXSL - HIPS | 74% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| SLRC - HIPS | 73% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
More | ||||
MFIC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFIC has been closely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFIC jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MFIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MFIC | 100% | +1.30% | ||
| OBDC - MFIC | 79% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| GBDC - MFIC | 78% Closely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| ARCC - MFIC | 78% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| BCSF - MFIC | 76% Closely correlated | +1.68% | ||
| SLRC - MFIC | 76% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
More | ||||