Advertisement
HIZOF vs QIND
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIZOF is a Hold and QIND is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HIZOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQIND’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HIZOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- QIND’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QIND’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- QIND’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
HIZOF (@Industrial Specialties) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QIND (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +1.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Specialties industry was +0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.87%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.35%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Specialties (+0.45% weekly)Companies in the industrial specialties industry process basic materials and minerals into various specialty products, such as flat and safety glass, fire retardant products, paints and coatings. Examples of companies operating in this industry are Sherwin-Williams Company, PPG Industries, Inc. and RPM International Inc.
@Industrial Machinery (+1.53% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| HIZOF | QIND | HIZOF / QIND | |
| Capitalization | 1.15B | 2.47M | 46,394% |
| EBITDA | 36.6B | 15.4M | 237,662% |
| Gain YTD | 11.074 | -63.833 | -17% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.33 | 0.21 | 3,480% |
| Revenue | 594B | 87.1M | 681,975% |
| Total Cash | 60B | 14.4K | 416,666,667% |
| Total Debt | 74.2B | 46.2M | 160,606% |
QIND | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HIZOF | QIND | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 14% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 11% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 23 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
Advertisement
HIZOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIZOF has been loosely correlated with CETY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HIZOF jumps, then CETY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HIZOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIZOF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CETY - HIZOF | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.80% | ||
| GRPRF - HIZOF | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SHLAF - HIZOF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GHM - HIZOF | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
| QIND - HIZOF | 10% Poorly correlated | -4.07% | ||
More | ||||
QIND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QIND and CHHGF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QIND and CHHGF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QIND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QIND | 100% | -4.07% | ||
| CHHGF - QIND | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RCHN - QIND | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SREMF - QIND | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.70% | ||
| HIZOF - QIND | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ATLFF - QIND | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||