Ad is loading...
HIZOF
Price
$6.96
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
SHLAF
Price
$294.85
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 6 closing price
Ad is loading...

HIZOF vs SHLAF

Header iconHIZOF vs SHLAF Comparison
Open Charts HIZOF vs SHLAFBanner chart's image
KANADEVIA
Price$6.96
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.5K
CapitalizationN/A
Schindler Holding AG
Price$294.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3
CapitalizationN/A
HIZOF vs SHLAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HIZOF vs. SHLAF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HIZOF is a Hold and SHLAF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (HIZOF: $6.96 vs. SHLAF: $294.85)
Brand notoriety: HIZOF and SHLAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HIZOF: 100% vs. SHLAF: 18%
Market capitalization -- HIZOF: $1.12B vs. SHLAF: $25.35B
HIZOF [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $1.12B. SHLAF’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $25.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $135.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $9.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HIZOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHLAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HIZOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SHLAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HIZOF and SHLAF are a good buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

HIZOF (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SHLAF (@Industrial Machinery) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.88%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (-0.80% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHLAF($25.4B) has a higher market cap than HIZOF($1.12B). SHLAF has higher P/E ratio than HIZOF: SHLAF (29.50) vs HIZOF (9.75). HIZOF YTD gains are higher at: 26.545 vs. SHLAF (22.885). HIZOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30.3B vs. SHLAF (1.44B). HIZOF has more cash in the bank: 86.4B vs. SHLAF (3.04B). SHLAF has less debt than HIZOF: SHLAF (658M) vs HIZOF (86.5B). HIZOF has higher revenues than SHLAF: HIZOF (493B) vs SHLAF (11.7B).
HIZOFSHLAFHIZOF / SHLAF
Capitalization1.12B25.4B4%
EBITDA30.3B1.44B2,109%
Gain YTD26.54522.885116%
P/E Ratio9.7529.5033%
Revenue493B11.7B4,214%
Total Cash86.4B3.04B2,847%
Total Debt86.5B658M13,146%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SHLAF: Fundamental Ratings
SHLAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLRN30.76N/A
N/A
SPDR® Blmbg Inv Grd Flt Rt ETF
WTV85.71-0.35
-0.41%
WisdomTree US Value ETF
IPOS12.22-0.06
-0.53%
Renaissance International IPO ETF
NZAC36.68-0.53
-1.42%
SPDR® MSCI ACWI Climate Paris AlignedETF
SAA28.36-0.54
-1.88%
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600

HIZOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIZOF has been loosely correlated with CETY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HIZOF jumps, then CETY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIZOF
1D Price
Change %
HIZOF100%
N/A
CETY - HIZOF
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.80%
GRPRF - HIZOF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHLAF - HIZOF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GHM - HIZOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
QIND - HIZOF
10%
Poorly correlated
+11.27%
More

SHLAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHLAF and KRNT have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHLAF and KRNT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHLAF
1D Price
Change %
SHLAF100%
N/A
KRNT - SHLAF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
AUUMF - SHLAF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HIZOF - SHLAF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VOYJF - SHLAF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JGHAF - SHLAF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More