HKBNF
Price
$0.40
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 29 closing price
HTWSF
Price
$1.19
Change
-$0.01 (-0.83%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

HKBNF vs HTWSF

Header iconHKBNF vs HTWSF Comparison
Open Charts HKBNF vs HTWSFBanner chart's image
HKBN
Price$0.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$250
CapitalizationN/A
Helios Towers
Price$1.19
Change-$0.01 (-0.83%)
Volume$12K
CapitalizationN/A
HKBNF vs HTWSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
HTWSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HKBNF vs. HTWSF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKBNF is a Hold and HTWSF is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (HKBNF: $0.40 vs. HTWSF: $1.19)
Brand notoriety: HKBNF and HTWSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HKBNF: 100% vs. HTWSF: 41%
Market capitalization -- HKBNF: $492.34M vs. HTWSF: $1.22B
HKBNF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $492.34M. HTWSF’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $1.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HKBNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHTWSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HKBNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HTWSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HKBNF is a better buy in the long-term than HTWSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HTWSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HTWSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

HKBNF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HTWSF (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was -0.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +83.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (-1.17% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HTWSF($1.22B) has a higher market cap than HKBNF($492M). HTWSF YTD gains are higher at: 3.448 vs. HKBNF (0.000). HKBNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.19B vs. HTWSF (113M). HKBNF has more cash in the bank: 1.01B vs. HTWSF (389M). HTWSF has less debt than HKBNF: HTWSF (1.47B) vs HKBNF (11.6B). HKBNF has higher revenues than HTWSF: HKBNF (11.5B) vs HTWSF (502M).
HKBNFHTWSFHKBNF / HTWSF
Capitalization492M1.22B40%
EBITDA2.19B113M1,940%
Gain YTD0.0003.448-
P/E Ratio23.42N/A-
Revenue11.5B502M2,291%
Total Cash1.01B389M259%
Total Debt11.6B1.47B789%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKBNFHTWSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
2%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
2%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HTWSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FPHAX26.900.11
+0.41%
Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Port
PGUAX14.83N/A
N/A
Virtus Duff & Phelps Global Infras A
WQDGX10.30-0.02
-0.19%
WCM Quality Dividend Growth Investor
NMIMX28.39-0.11
-0.39%
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core Inst
FSDIX17.80-0.08
-0.45%
Fidelity Strategic Dividend & Income

HKBNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HKBNF and KORE have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HKBNF and KORE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKBNF
1D Price
Change %
HKBNF100%
N/A
KORE - HKBNF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.65%
AAFRF - HKBNF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HTWSF - HKBNF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IHS - HKBNF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
CUCSF - HKBNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HTWSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HTWSF and LBTYA have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HTWSF and LBTYA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HTWSF
1D Price
Change %
HTWSF100%
N/A
LBTYA - HTWSF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
SFTBY - HTWSF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
LBTYK - HTWSF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.74%
SKM - HTWSF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
VDMCY - HTWSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.58%
More