HKCVF
Price
$0.62
Change
-$0.02 (-3.12%)
Updated
Mar 20 closing price
Capitalization
5.5B
HPIFY
Price
$15.77
Change
-$1.43 (-8.31%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
7.55B
Ad is loading...

HKCVF vs HPIFY

Header iconHKCVF vs HPIFY Comparison
Open Charts HKCVF vs HPIFYBanner chart's image
HK Electric Investments & HK Electric Investments
Price$0.62
Change-$0.02 (-3.12%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization5.5B
Huadian Power International
Price$15.77
Change-$1.43 (-8.31%)
Volume$619
Capitalization7.55B
HKCVF vs HPIFY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HKCVF vs. HPIFY commentary
Jan 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKCVF is a Hold and HPIFY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2025
Stock price -- (HKCVF: $0.62 vs. HPIFY: $15.77)
Brand notoriety: HKCVF and HPIFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HKCVF: 100% vs. HPIFY: 100%
Market capitalization -- HKCVF: $5.5B vs. HPIFY: $7.55B
HKCVF [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $5.5B. HPIFY’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $7.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HKCVF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHPIFY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HKCVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HPIFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HKCVF and HPIFY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

HKCVF (@Electric Utilities) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HPIFY (@Electric Utilities) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (-0.76% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HPIFY($7.56B) has a higher market cap than HKCVF($5.5B). HPIFY has higher P/E ratio than HKCVF: HPIFY (22.22) vs HKCVF (13.93). HKCVF (0.000) and HPIFY (0.000) have similar YTD gains . HKCVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.71B vs. HPIFY (3.71B). HPIFY has more cash in the bank: 7.18B vs. HKCVF (55M). HKCVF has less debt than HPIFY: HKCVF (49.7B) vs HPIFY (124B). HPIFY has higher revenues than HKCVF: HPIFY (110B) vs HKCVF (11B).
HKCVFHPIFYHKCVF / HPIFY
Capitalization5.5B7.56B73%
EBITDA7.71B3.71B208%
Gain YTD0.0000.000-
P/E Ratio13.9322.2263%
Revenue11B110B10%
Total Cash55M7.18B1%
Total Debt49.7B124B40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HKCVF: Fundamental Ratings
HKCVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
42
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKCVFHPIFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SZCRX51.351.02
+2.03%
DWS Small Cap Core R6
JDERX12.340.10
+0.82%
PGIM Jennison Mid-Cap Growth R
DRLIX7.860.05
+0.64%
BNY Mellon Developed Markets RE Scs - I
MINIX38.920.20
+0.52%
MFS International Intrinsic Value I
LEVOX4.100.01
+0.24%
Lazard US Equity Concentrated Open

HKCVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HKCVF and HGKGF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HKCVF and HGKGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKCVF
1D Price
Change %
HKCVF100%
N/A
HGKGF - HKCVF
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.59%
HUNGF - HKCVF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HGKGY - HKCVF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
HPIFY - HKCVF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKVTY - HKCVF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HPIFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HPIFY and NGG have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HPIFY and NGG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HPIFY
1D Price
Change %
HPIFY100%
N/A
NGG - HPIFY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
ETR - HPIFY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
HKVTY - HPIFY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBDRY - HPIFY
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
IBDSF - HPIFY
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
More