HKCVF
Price
$0.67
Change
+$0.05 (+8.06%)
Updated
Mar 26 closing price
Capitalization
6.79B
HPIFY
Price
$17.41
Change
+$1.71 (+10.89%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
7.98B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HKCVF vs HPIFY

Header iconHKCVF vs HPIFY Comparison
Open Charts HKCVF vs HPIFYBanner chart's image
HK Electric Investments & HK Electric Investments
Price$0.67
Change+$0.05 (+8.06%)
Volume$6.41K
Capitalization6.79B
Huadian Power International
Price$17.41
Change+$1.71 (+10.89%)
Volume$317
Capitalization7.98B
HKCVF vs HPIFY Comparison Chart in %
HKCVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HPIFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HKCVF vs. HPIFY commentary
Oct 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKCVF is a Hold and HPIFY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 04, 2025
Stock price -- (HKCVF: $0.67 vs. HPIFY: $17.41)
Brand notoriety: HKCVF and HPIFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HKCVF: 100% vs. HPIFY: 142%
Market capitalization -- HKCVF: $6.79B vs. HPIFY: $7.98B
HKCVF [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $6.79B. HPIFY’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $7.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $161B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $22.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HKCVF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHPIFY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HKCVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HPIFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HKCVF and HPIFY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HKCVF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HPIFY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HKCVF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • HPIFY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HPIFY is a better buy in the short-term than HKCVF.

Price Growth

HKCVF (@Electric Utilities) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HPIFY (@Electric Utilities) price change was +13.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+0.70% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HPIFY($7.98B) has a higher market cap than HKCVF($6.79B). HKCVF has higher P/E ratio than HPIFY: HKCVF (13.92) vs HPIFY (7.95). HPIFY YTD gains are higher at: 14.356 vs. HKCVF (8.126). HPIFY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 23.7B vs. HKCVF (8.75B). HPIFY has higher revenues than HKCVF: HPIFY (107B) vs HKCVF (12.1B).
HKCVFHPIFYHKCVF / HPIFY
Capitalization6.79B7.98B85%
EBITDA8.75B23.7B37%
Gain YTD8.12614.35657%
P/E Ratio13.927.95175%
Revenue12.1B107B11%
Total Cash45MN/A-
Total Debt51.4BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HKCVF vs HPIFY: Fundamental Ratings
HKCVF
HPIFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4546
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1007
SMR RATING
1..100
9974
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5772
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4766
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HKCVF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as HPIFY (28). This means that HKCVF’s stock grew similarly to HPIFY’s over the last 12 months.

HPIFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HKCVF (100). This means that HPIFY’s stock grew significantly faster than HKCVF’s over the last 12 months.

HPIFY's SMR Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as HKCVF (99). This means that HPIFY’s stock grew similarly to HKCVF’s over the last 12 months.

HKCVF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as HPIFY (72). This means that HKCVF’s stock grew similarly to HPIFY’s over the last 12 months.

HKCVF's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as HPIFY (66). This means that HKCVF’s stock grew similarly to HPIFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKCVFHPIFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HKCVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HPIFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBCA26.080.04
+0.17%
iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corp ETF
DSL12.32-0.04
-0.32%
DOUBLELINE Income SOLUTIONS FUND
DFNL44.90-0.18
-0.41%
Davis Select Financial ETF
SMCF33.27-0.15
-0.43%
Themes US Small Cp CA Flw Champ ETF
UGA61.96-1.25
-1.98%
United States Gasoline

HPIFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HPIFY and NGG have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HPIFY and NGG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HPIFY
1D Price
Change %
HPIFY100%
+14.87%
NGG - HPIFY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
ETR - HPIFY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
HKVTY - HPIFY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IESFY - HPIFY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKCVF - HPIFY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More