HKCVF
Price
$0.67
Change
+$0.05 (+8.06%)
Updated
Mar 26 closing price
Capitalization
6.79B
HRNNF
Price
$35.40
Change
+$0.08 (+0.23%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
Capitalization
21.48B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HKCVF vs HRNNF

Header iconHKCVF vs HRNNF Comparison
Open Charts HKCVF vs HRNNFBanner chart's image
HK Electric Investments & HK Electric Investments
Price$0.67
Change+$0.05 (+8.06%)
Volume$6.41K
Capitalization6.79B
Hydro One
Price$35.40
Change+$0.08 (+0.23%)
Volume$3.56K
Capitalization21.48B
HKCVF vs HRNNF Comparison Chart in %
HKCVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HRNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HKCVF vs. HRNNF commentary
Oct 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKCVF is a Hold and HRNNF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 04, 2025
Stock price -- (HKCVF: $0.67 vs. HRNNF: $35.85)
Brand notoriety: HKCVF and HRNNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HKCVF: 100% vs. HRNNF: 25%
Market capitalization -- HKCVF: $6.79B vs. HRNNF: $21.48B
HKCVF [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $6.79B. HRNNF’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $21.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $161B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $22.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HKCVF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHRNNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HKCVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HRNNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HKCVF and HRNNF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HKCVF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HRNNF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HKCVF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • HRNNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HKCVF is a better buy in the short-term than HRNNF.

Price Growth

HKCVF (@Electric Utilities) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HRNNF (@Electric Utilities) price change was +1.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+0.70% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HRNNF($21.5B) has a higher market cap than HKCVF($6.79B). HRNNF has higher P/E ratio than HKCVF: HRNNF (23.59) vs HKCVF (13.92). HRNNF YTD gains are higher at: 15.804 vs. HKCVF (8.126). HKCVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.75B vs. HRNNF (3.05B). HRNNF has more cash in the bank: 71M vs. HKCVF (45M). HRNNF has less debt than HKCVF: HRNNF (18.1B) vs HKCVF (51.4B). HKCVF has higher revenues than HRNNF: HKCVF (12.1B) vs HRNNF (8.76B).
HKCVFHRNNFHKCVF / HRNNF
Capitalization6.79B21.5B32%
EBITDA8.75B3.05B287%
Gain YTD8.12615.80451%
P/E Ratio13.9223.5959%
Revenue12.1B8.76B138%
Total Cash45M71M63%
Total Debt51.4B18.1B284%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HKCVF vs HRNNF: Fundamental Ratings
HKCVF
HRNNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4573
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10015
SMR RATING
1..100
9969
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5759
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4750
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HKCVF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HRNNF (72). This means that HKCVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HRNNF’s over the last 12 months.

HRNNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HKCVF (100). This means that HRNNF’s stock grew significantly faster than HKCVF’s over the last 12 months.

HRNNF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as HKCVF (99). This means that HRNNF’s stock grew similarly to HKCVF’s over the last 12 months.

HKCVF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as HRNNF (59). This means that HKCVF’s stock grew similarly to HRNNF’s over the last 12 months.

HKCVF's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as HRNNF (50). This means that HKCVF’s stock grew similarly to HRNNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKCVFHRNNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HKCVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HRNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HYDR41.344.28
+11.55%
Global X Hydrogen ETF
CONL47.091.94
+4.30%
GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF
GRW32.510.15
+0.46%
TCW Durable Growth ETF
DINT28.350.05
+0.19%
Davis Select International ETF
FIXP19.81N/A
N/A
FolioBeyond Enhanced Fixed Inc Prm ETF

HRNNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HRNNF has been loosely correlated with FTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HRNNF jumps, then FTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HRNNF
1D Price
Change %
HRNNF100%
N/A
FTS - HRNNF
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
NEE - HRNNF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
NWE - HRNNF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
EVRG - HRNNF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
EIX - HRNNF
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.18%
More