HKCVF
Price
$0.67
Change
+$0.05 (+8.06%)
Updated
Mar 26 closing price
Capitalization
6.74B
IESFY
Price
$138.71
Change
-$1.24 (-0.89%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.53B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HKCVF vs IESFY

Header iconHKCVF vs IESFY Comparison
Open Charts HKCVF vs IESFYBanner chart's image
HK Electric Investments & HK Electric Investments
Price$0.67
Change+$0.05 (+8.06%)
Volume$6.41K
Capitalization6.74B
Interconexion Electrica S.A. E.S.P. - ISA
Price$138.71
Change-$1.24 (-0.89%)
Volume$367
Capitalization6.53B
HKCVF vs IESFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HKCVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IESFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HKCVF vs. IESFY commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKCVF is a Hold and IESFY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (HKCVF: $0.67 vs. IESFY: $138.71)
Brand notoriety: HKCVF and IESFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HKCVF: 100% vs. IESFY: 1119%
Market capitalization -- HKCVF: $6.74B vs. IESFY: $6.53B
HKCVF [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $6.74B. IESFY’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $6.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $153.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $22.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HKCVF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIESFY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HKCVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IESFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IESFY is a better buy in the long-term than HKCVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HKCVF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IESFY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HKCVF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • IESFY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HKCVF is a better buy in the short-term than IESFY.

Price Growth

HKCVF (@Electric Utilities) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IESFY (@Electric Utilities) price change was +1.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+0.37% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HKCVF($6.74B) and IESFY($6.53B) have the same market capitalization . HKCVF has higher P/E ratio than IESFY: HKCVF (13.92) vs IESFY (9.12). IESFY YTD gains are higher at: 56.214 vs. HKCVF (8.126). IESFY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.07T vs. HKCVF (8.75B). IESFY has more cash in the bank: 4.93T vs. HKCVF (45M). IESFY has higher revenues than HKCVF: IESFY (16.24T) vs HKCVF (12.1B).
HKCVFIESFYHKCVF / IESFY
Capitalization6.74B6.53B103%
EBITDA8.75B9.07T0%
Gain YTD8.12656.21414%
P/E Ratio13.929.12153%
Revenue12.1B16.24T0%
Total Cash45M4.93T0%
Total Debt51.4BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HKCVF vs IESFY: Fundamental Ratings
HKCVF
IESFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4412
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10073
SMR RATING
1..100
9932
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5746
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4530
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a15

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HKCVF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as IESFY (43). This means that HKCVF’s stock grew similarly to IESFY’s over the last 12 months.

IESFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as HKCVF (100). This means that IESFY’s stock grew similarly to HKCVF’s over the last 12 months.

IESFY's SMR Rating (32) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HKCVF (99). This means that IESFY’s stock grew significantly faster than HKCVF’s over the last 12 months.

IESFY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as HKCVF (57). This means that IESFY’s stock grew similarly to HKCVF’s over the last 12 months.

IESFY's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as HKCVF (45). This means that IESFY’s stock grew similarly to HKCVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKCVFIESFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HKCVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IESFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FAN18.89-0.02
-0.09%
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF
NUSA23.42-0.03
-0.14%
Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year US Aggt Bd ETF
SPYH54.23-0.16
-0.29%
NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF
FV61.21-0.40
-0.64%
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF
AIO23.85-0.30
-1.24%
Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund

HKCVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HKCVF and HPIFY have been poorly correlated (+-0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HKCVF and HPIFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKCVF
1D Price
Change %
HKCVF100%
N/A
HPIFY - HKCVF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKVTY - HKCVF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRNNF - HKCVF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IESFY - HKCVF
-9%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%

IESFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IESFY and CNP have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IESFY and CNP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IESFY
1D Price
Change %
IESFY100%
-0.89%
CNP - IESFY
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
HRNNF - IESFY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKVTY - IESFY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HPIFY - IESFY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKCVF - IESFY
-9%
Poorly correlated
N/A