HKD
Price
$1.81
Change
+$0.03 (+1.68%)
Updated
Oct 6, 04:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
568.85M
VEEV
Price
$299.72
Change
+$3.44 (+1.16%)
Updated
Oct 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
49.13B
51 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HKD vs VEEV

Header iconHKD vs VEEV Comparison
Open Charts HKD vs VEEVBanner chart's image
AMTD Digital
Price$1.81
Change+$0.03 (+1.68%)
Volume$1.44K
Capitalization568.85M
Veeva Systems
Price$299.72
Change+$3.44 (+1.16%)
Volume$18.76K
Capitalization49.13B
HKD vs VEEV Comparison Chart in %
HKD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VEEV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HKD vs. VEEV commentary
Oct 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKD is a Buy and VEEV is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 07, 2025
Stock price -- (HKD: $1.81 vs. VEEV: $299.76)
Brand notoriety: HKD and VEEV are both not notable
HKD represents the Packaged Software, while VEEV is part of the Services to the Health Industry industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HKD: 51% vs. VEEV: 92%
Market capitalization -- HKD: $568.85M vs. VEEV: $49.13B
HKD [@Packaged Software] is valued at $568.85M. VEEV’s [@Services to the Health Industry] market capitalization is $49.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $314.56B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $49.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.04B. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HKD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVEEV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HKD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VEEV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, VEEV is a better buy in the long-term than HKD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HKD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VEEV’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HKD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • VEEV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VEEV is a better buy in the short-term than HKD.

Price Growth

HKD (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.63% price change this week, while VEEV (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was +2.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +236.49%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +4.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

VEEV is expected to report earnings on Nov 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Services to the Health Industry (+4.44% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEEV($49.1B) has a higher market cap than HKD($569M). VEEV has higher P/E ratio than HKD: VEEV (61.68) vs HKD (7.80). VEEV YTD gains are higher at: 40.918 vs. HKD (-38.851). VEEV has more cash in the bank: 6.4B vs. HKD (154M). VEEV has less debt than HKD: VEEV (85.4M) vs HKD (120M).
HKDVEEVHKD / VEEV
Capitalization569M49.1B1%
EBITDAN/A839M-
Gain YTD-38.85140.918-95%
P/E Ratio7.8061.6813%
RevenueN/A2.97B-
Total Cash154M6.4B2%
Total Debt120M85.4M141%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VEEV: Fundamental Ratings
VEEV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
24
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
84
SMR RATING
1..100
57
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKDVEEV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HKD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VEEV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EFO61.770.96
+1.57%
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
BITB66.821.02
+1.55%
Bitwise Bitcoin ETF
FYT56.780.56
+0.99%
First Trust Small Cap Val AlphaDEX® ETF
VLU205.180.68
+0.33%
SPDR® S&P 1500 Value Tilt ETF
MSLC54.670.09
+0.16%
Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Eq ETF

HKD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HKD has been loosely correlated with AI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HKD jumps, then AI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKD
1D Price
Change %
HKD100%
+1.12%
AI - HKD
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.61%
CETX - HKD
32%
Poorly correlated
+7.41%
VEEV - HKD
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
TALK - HKD
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.54%
ONTF - HKD
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
More