Advertisement
HKHHF vs HSEEF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKHHF is a Hold and HSEEF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HKHHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHSEEF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HKHHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HSEEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HKHHF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HSEEF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HKHHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- HSEEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
HKHHF (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а -3.10% price change this week, while HSEEF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was -0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.84%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +27.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +28.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.34%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (-0.95% weekly)The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+27.76% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| HKHHF | HSEEF | HKHHF / HSEEF | |
| Capitalization | 19.4B | 452K | 4,292,035% |
| EBITDA | 6.14B | -782.81K | -784,482% |
| Gain YTD | 16.020 | -57.699 | -28% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.04 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 29.2B | 2.34M | 1,246,265% |
| Total Cash | 2.08B | 194K | 1,071,134% |
| Total Debt | 17.6B | 3.14M | 559,975% |
HKHHF | HSEEF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 84 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 35 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HKHHF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HSEEF (69). This means that HKHHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HSEEF’s over the last 12 months.
HKHHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HSEEF (100). This means that HKHHF’s stock grew similarly to HSEEF’s over the last 12 months.
HKHHF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as HSEEF (100). This means that HKHHF’s stock grew similarly to HSEEF’s over the last 12 months.
HKHHF's Price Growth Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as HSEEF (84). This means that HKHHF’s stock grew similarly to HSEEF’s over the last 12 months.
HSEEF's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as HKHHF (94). This means that HSEEF’s stock grew similarly to HKHHF’s over the last 12 months.
| HKHHF | HSEEF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 42% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 48% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MYI | 10.69 | 0.12 | +1.14% |
| Blackrock Muniyield Quality Fund III | |||
| SNOY | 15.00 | 0.16 | +1.08% |
| YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
| PSCC | 34.98 | 0.11 | +0.32% |
| Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Stapl ETF | |||
| IWP | 142.78 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF | |||
| IDE | 12.31 | -0.06 | -0.49% |
| Voya Infrastructure Industrials AND Materials Fund | |||
HKHHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HKHHF has been loosely correlated with HEINY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HKHHF jumps, then HEINY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HKHHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HKHHF | 100% | -0.17% | ||
| HEINY - HKHHF | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| HKHHY - HKHHF | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| HINKF - HKHHF | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| PDRDF - HKHHF | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.43% | ||
| BUD - HKHHF | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.79% | ||
More | ||||
HSEEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HSEEF and NWINF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HSEEF and NWINF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HSEEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSEEF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NWINF - HSEEF | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.89% | ||
| HINKF - HSEEF | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.43% | ||
| HEINY - HSEEF | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.10% | ||
| HKHHY - HSEEF | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
| HKHHF - HSEEF | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||