HKXCF
Price
$58.81
Change
-$0.30 (-0.51%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
72.83B
OSCUF
Price
$11.67
Change
-$0.59 (-4.81%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
11.66B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HKXCF vs OSCUF

Header iconHKXCF vs OSCUF Comparison
Open Charts HKXCF vs OSCUFBanner chart's image
Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing
Price$58.81
Change-$0.30 (-0.51%)
Volume$1.68K
Capitalization72.83B
Japan Exchange Group
Price$11.67
Change-$0.59 (-4.81%)
Volume$2.38K
Capitalization11.66B
HKXCF vs OSCUF Comparison Chart in %
HKXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OSCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HKXCF vs. OSCUF commentary
Oct 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKXCF is a Hold and OSCUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 08, 2025
Stock price -- (HKXCF: $58.81 vs. OSCUF: $11.67)
Brand notoriety: HKXCF and OSCUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HKXCF: 71% vs. OSCUF: 20%
Market capitalization -- HKXCF: $72.83B vs. OSCUF: $11.66B
HKXCF [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $72.83B. OSCUF’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $11.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $146.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $30.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HKXCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOSCUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HKXCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OSCUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HKXCF is a better buy in the long-term than OSCUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HKXCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OSCUF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HKXCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • OSCUF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OSCUF is a better buy in the short-term than HKXCF.

Price Growth

HKXCF (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +0.98% price change this week, while OSCUF (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -4.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.04%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (+0.68% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HKXCF($72.8B) has a higher market cap than OSCUF($11.7B). HKXCF has higher P/E ratio than OSCUF: HKXCF (37.57) vs OSCUF (29.74). HKXCF YTD gains are higher at: 61.000 vs. OSCUF (-5.887). OSCUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 109B vs. HKXCF (24.5B). HKXCF has more cash in the bank: 282B vs. OSCUF (255B). HKXCF has less debt than OSCUF: HKXCF (873M) vs OSCUF (52.5B). OSCUF has higher revenues than HKXCF: OSCUF (164B) vs HKXCF (20.3B).
HKXCFOSCUFHKXCF / OSCUF
Capitalization72.8B11.7B622%
EBITDA24.5B109B22%
Gain YTD61.000-5.887-1,036%
P/E Ratio37.5729.74126%
Revenue20.3B164B12%
Total Cash282B255B111%
Total Debt873M52.5B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HKXCF vs OSCUF: Fundamental Ratings
HKXCF
OSCUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7126
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80100
SMR RATING
1..100
3426
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4347
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2959
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a8

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HKXCF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OSCUF (89). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OSCUF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as OSCUF (100). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew similarly to OSCUF’s over the last 12 months.

OSCUF's SMR Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as HKXCF (34). This means that OSCUF’s stock grew similarly to HKXCF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as OSCUF (47). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew similarly to OSCUF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as OSCUF (59). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew similarly to OSCUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKXCFOSCUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
35%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HKXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OSCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNTB1.780.18
+11.25%
Connect Biopharma Holdings Limited
EBS9.920.78
+8.53%
Emergent Biosolutions
ARQT20.570.81
+4.10%
Arcutis Biotherapeutics
RPM112.75-1.45
-1.27%
RPM International
PMCB1.01-0.02
-1.94%
PharmaCyte Biotech

HKXCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HKXCF has been loosely correlated with HKXCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HKXCF jumps, then HKXCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKXCF
1D Price
Change %
HKXCF100%
-0.51%
HKXCY - HKXCF
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
TIGR - HKXCF
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.87%
FUTU - HKXCF
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
OSCUF - HKXCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.81%
DSEEY - HKXCF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.60%
More

OSCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OSCUF and DSEEY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OSCUF and DSEEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OSCUF
1D Price
Change %
OSCUF100%
-4.81%
DSEEY - OSCUF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.60%
JPXGY - OSCUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.24%
HKXCF - OSCUF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
MCQEF - OSCUF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NZSTF - OSCUF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More