HKXCF
Price
$60.12
Change
+$2.75 (+4.79%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
73.64B
OSCUF
Price
$11.28
Change
+$1.47 (+15.00%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
10.95B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HKXCF vs OSCUF

Header iconHKXCF vs OSCUF Comparison
Open Charts HKXCF vs OSCUFBanner chart's image
Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing
Price$60.12
Change+$2.75 (+4.79%)
Volume$2.46K
Capitalization73.64B
Japan Exchange Group
Price$11.28
Change+$1.47 (+15.00%)
Volume$1.6K
Capitalization10.95B
HKXCF vs OSCUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HKXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OSCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HKXCF vs. OSCUF commentary
Aug 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKXCF is a StrongBuy and OSCUF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 27, 2025
Stock price -- (HKXCF: $60.12 vs. OSCUF: $11.27)
Brand notoriety: HKXCF and OSCUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HKXCF: 57% vs. OSCUF: 93%
Market capitalization -- HKXCF: $73.64B vs. OSCUF: $10.95B
HKXCF [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $73.64B. OSCUF’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $10.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $168.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $31.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HKXCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOSCUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HKXCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OSCUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HKXCF is a better buy in the long-term than OSCUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HKXCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OSCUF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HKXCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • OSCUF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OSCUF is a better buy in the short-term than HKXCF.

Price Growth

HKXCF (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +7.84% price change this week, while OSCUF (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +5.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.22%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (+0.03% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HKXCF($73.6B) has a higher market cap than OSCUF($10.9B). HKXCF has higher P/E ratio than OSCUF: HKXCF (38.58) vs OSCUF (28.27). HKXCF YTD gains are higher at: 64.586 vs. OSCUF (-9.073). OSCUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 109B vs. HKXCF (23.7B). OSCUF (255B) and HKXCF (247B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . HKXCF has less debt than OSCUF: HKXCF (1.71B) vs OSCUF (52.5B). OSCUF has higher revenues than HKXCF: OSCUF (164B) vs HKXCF (19B).
HKXCFOSCUFHKXCF / OSCUF
Capitalization73.6B10.9B675%
EBITDA23.7B109B22%
Gain YTD64.586-9.073-712%
P/E Ratio38.5828.27136%
Revenue19B164B12%
Total Cash247B255B97%
Total Debt1.71B52.5B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HKXCF vs OSCUF: Fundamental Ratings
HKXCF
OSCUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
276
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
77100
SMR RATING
1..100
3526
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4146
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1659
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a39

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HKXCF's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as OSCUF (87). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew similarly to OSCUF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as OSCUF (100). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew similarly to OSCUF’s over the last 12 months.

OSCUF's SMR Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as HKXCF (35). This means that OSCUF’s stock grew similarly to HKXCF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as OSCUF (46). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew similarly to OSCUF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OSCUF (59). This means that HKXCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OSCUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKXCFOSCUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
33%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HKXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OSCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPHB105.050.67
+0.64%
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
MAGS60.300.20
+0.33%
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
QMMY24.050.03
+0.11%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Mod Buffr ETF - May
EWO31.37-0.13
-0.41%
iShares MSCI Austria ETF
VRAI23.73-0.12
-0.49%
Virtus Real Asset Income ETF

HKXCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HKXCF has been loosely correlated with HKXCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HKXCF jumps, then HKXCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKXCF
1D Price
Change %
HKXCF100%
+4.79%
HKXCY - HKXCF
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
TIGR - HKXCF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
FUTU - HKXCF
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.46%
OSCUF - HKXCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSEEY - HKXCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.80%
More

OSCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OSCUF and DSEEY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OSCUF and DSEEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OSCUF
1D Price
Change %
OSCUF100%
N/A
DSEEY - OSCUF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.80%
JPXGY - OSCUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
HKXCF - OSCUF
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.79%
MCQEF - OSCUF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NZSTF - OSCUF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More