HKXCY
Price
$38.47
Change
-$9.67 (-20.09%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
5 days until earnings call
IGGRF
Price
$12.42
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

HKXCY vs IGGRF

Header iconHKXCY vs IGGRF Comparison
Open Charts HKXCY vs IGGRFBanner chart's image
Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing
Price$38.47
Change-$9.67 (-20.09%)
Volume$370.37K
CapitalizationN/A
IG Group Holdings
Price$12.42
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
HKXCY vs IGGRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
HKXCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
HKXCY vs. IGGRF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HKXCY is a Sell and IGGRF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (HKXCY: $38.47 vs. IGGRF: $12.42)
Brand notoriety: HKXCY and IGGRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HKXCY: 364% vs. IGGRF: 5%
Market capitalization -- HKXCY: $52.98B vs. IGGRF: $3.69B
HKXCY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $52.98B. IGGRF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $3.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HKXCY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIGGRF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HKXCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IGGRF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, IGGRF is a better buy in the long-term than HKXCY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HKXCY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HKXCY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

HKXCY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -10.22% price change this week, while IGGRF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

HKXCY is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.30% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HKXCY($53B) has a higher market cap than IGGRF($3.69B). HKXCY has higher P/E ratio than IGGRF: HKXCY (37.74) vs IGGRF (7.81). IGGRF YTD gains are higher at: 33.119 vs. HKXCY (18.512). HKXCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.2B vs. IGGRF (552M). HKXCY has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. IGGRF (1B). IGGRF has less debt than HKXCY: IGGRF (316M) vs HKXCY (1.76B). HKXCY has higher revenues than IGGRF: HKXCY (16.4B) vs IGGRF (1B).
HKXCYIGGRFHKXCY / IGGRF
Capitalization53B3.69B1,438%
EBITDA16.2B552M2,935%
Gain YTD18.51233.11956%
P/E Ratio37.747.81483%
Revenue16.4B1B1,633%
Total Cash265B1B26,394%
Total Debt1.76B316M557%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HKXCY vs IGGRF: Fundamental Ratings
HKXCY
IGGRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1449
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6516
SMR RATING
1..100
720
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3741
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3047
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IGGRF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HKXCY (92). This means that IGGRF’s stock grew significantly faster than HKXCY’s over the last 12 months.

IGGRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HKXCY (65). This means that IGGRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HKXCY’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCY's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as IGGRF (20). This means that HKXCY’s stock grew similarly to IGGRF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCY's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as IGGRF (41). This means that HKXCY’s stock grew similarly to IGGRF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCY's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as IGGRF (47). This means that HKXCY’s stock grew similarly to IGGRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HKXCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HKXCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

HKXCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HKXCY has been loosely correlated with FUTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HKXCY jumps, then FUTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKXCY
1D Price
Change %
HKXCY100%
-2.48%
FUTU - HKXCY
65%
Loosely correlated
-5.82%
TIGR - HKXCY
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
HKXCF - HKXCY
53%
Loosely correlated
-3.33%
TOP - HKXCY
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
MQBKY - HKXCY
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
More

IGGRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IGGRF and DYNA have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IGGRF and DYNA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IGGRF
1D Price
Change %
IGGRF100%
N/A
DYNA - IGGRF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNSTY - IGGRF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
LDNXF - IGGRF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
IGGHY - IGGRF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKXCY - IGGRF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.48%
More