HL
Price
$5.00
Change
-$0.33 (-6.19%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
56 days until earnings call
LOMLF
Price
$0.18
Change
+$0.01 (+5.88%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

HL vs LOMLF

Header iconHL vs LOMLF Comparison
Open Charts HL vs LOMLFBanner chart's image
Hecla Mining
Price$5.00
Change-$0.33 (-6.19%)
Volume$88.37K
CapitalizationN/A
Lion One Metals
Price$0.18
Change+$0.01 (+5.88%)
Volume$376.82K
CapitalizationN/A
HL vs LOMLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HL vs. LOMLF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HL is a Hold and LOMLF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (HL: $5.33 vs. LOMLF: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: HL: Notable vs. LOMLF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HL: 99% vs. LOMLF: 158%
Market capitalization -- HL: $3.01B vs. LOMLF: $129.14M
HL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.01B. LOMLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $129.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLOMLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LOMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the long-term than LOMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOMLF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LOMLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LOMLF is a better buy in the short-term than HL.

Price Growth

HL (@Precious Metals) experienced а -6.33% price change this week, while LOMLF (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

HL is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.69% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HL($3.01B) has a higher market cap than LOMLF($129M). HL YTD gains are higher at: 11.618 vs. LOMLF (-71.024). HL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 124M vs. LOMLF (-3.37M). HL has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. LOMLF (36.9M). LOMLF has less debt than HL: LOMLF (25.9M) vs HL (663M). HL has higher revenues than LOMLF: HL (720M) vs LOMLF (0).
HLLOMLFHL / LOMLF
Capitalization3.01B129M2,331%
EBITDA124M-3.37M-3,676%
Gain YTD11.618-71.024-16%
P/E Ratio1111.11N/A-
Revenue720M0-
Total Cash106M36.9M287%
Total Debt663M25.9M2,560%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HL vs LOMLF: Fundamental Ratings
HL
LOMLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
92
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
54100
SMR RATING
1..100
8991
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6192
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOMLF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HL (97) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LOMLF’s stock grew significantly faster than HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOMLF (100) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOMLF’s over the last 12 months.

HL's SMR Rating (89) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as LOMLF (91) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to LOMLF’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as LOMLF (92) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to LOMLF’s over the last 12 months.

HL's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for LOMLF (100) in the null industry. This means that HL’s stock grew significantly faster than LOMLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLLOMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPEGX18.78N/A
N/A
Alger Responsible Investing A
GSYPX43.22N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value P
RIDFX24.78-0.13
-0.52%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R5
IFUTX26.11-0.15
-0.57%
Invesco Dividend Income R6
PEMZX13.19-0.10
-0.75%
Putnam Emerging Markets Equity C

LOMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOMLF has been loosely correlated with HMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LOMLF jumps, then HMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOMLF
1D Price
Change %
LOMLF100%
+7.60%
HMY - LOMLF
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.14%
HL - LOMLF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
KGC - LOMLF
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.95%
GOLD - LOMLF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
EGO - LOMLF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
More