Ad is loading...
HL
Price
$5.50
Change
-$0.10 (-1.79%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
87 days until earnings call
NG
Price
$3.39
Change
-$0.11 (-3.14%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
66 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HL vs NG

Header iconHL vs NG Comparison
Open Charts HL vs NGBanner chart's image
Hecla Mining
Price$5.50
Change-$0.10 (-1.79%)
Volume$31.11M
CapitalizationN/A
NovaGold Resources
Price$3.39
Change-$0.11 (-3.14%)
Volume$2.1M
CapitalizationN/A
HL vs NG Comparison Chart
Loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
NG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HL vs. NG commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HL is a Sell and NG is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (HL: $5.50 vs. NG: $3.39)
Brand notoriety: HL: Notable vs. NG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HL: 246% vs. NG: 178%
Market capitalization -- HL: $3.01B vs. NG: $1B
HL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.01B. NG’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the long-term than NG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NG is a better buy in the short-term than HL.

Price Growth

HL (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.01% price change this week, while NG (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

HL is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

NG is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HL($3.01B) has a higher market cap than NG($1B). HL YTD gains are higher at: 14.897 vs. NG (-9.358). HL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 124M vs. NG (-33.7M). NG has more cash in the bank: 126M vs. HL (106M). NG has less debt than HL: NG (138M) vs HL (663M). HL has higher revenues than NG: HL (720M) vs NG (0).
HLNGHL / NG
Capitalization3.01B1B301%
EBITDA124M-33.7M-368%
Gain YTD14.897-9.358-159%
P/E Ratio1111.11N/A-
Revenue720M0-
Total Cash106M126M84%
Total Debt663M138M480%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HL vs NG: Fundamental Ratings
HL
NG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5269
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49100
SMR RATING
1..100
87100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6177
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
491

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NG's Valuation (95) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as HL (97). This means that NG’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NG (100). This means that HL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NG’s over the last 12 months.

HL's SMR Rating (87) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NG (100). This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to NG’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NG (77). This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to NG’s over the last 12 months.

HL's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for NG (100). This means that HL’s stock grew significantly faster than NG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLNG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
NG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VTRIX41.30-0.13
-0.31%
Vanguard International Value Inv
FDERX25.88-0.15
-0.58%
Federated Hermes Equity Income R
WMMAX15.33-0.11
-0.71%
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites A
NWAHX19.55-0.19
-0.96%
Nationwide Janus Henderson Overseas R6
PPNPX14.50-0.28
-1.89%
Principal SmallCap Growth I R5

HL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HL has been closely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HL jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HL
1D Price
Change %
HL100%
-1.79%
CDE - HL
85%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
FSM - HL
84%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
PAAS - HL
84%
Closely correlated
-2.15%
MAG - HL
81%
Closely correlated
-1.97%
AG - HL
81%
Closely correlated
-1.63%
More