HL
Price
$5.75
Change
-$0.02 (-0.35%)
Updated
Jan 31, 11:07 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.01B
12 days until earnings call
TFPM
Price
$16.20
Change
-$0.11 (-0.67%)
Updated
Jan 31, 11:57 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.91B
19 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HL vs TFPM

Header iconHL vs TFPM Comparison
Open Charts HL vs TFPMBanner chart's image
Hecla Mining
Price$5.75
Change-$0.02 (-0.35%)
Volume$2.48K
Capitalization3.01B
Triple Flag Precious Metals
Price$16.20
Change-$0.11 (-0.67%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.91B
HL vs TFPM Comparison Chart
Loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HL vs. TFPM commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HL is a StrongBuy and TFPM is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (HL: $5.78 vs. TFPM: $16.30)
Brand notoriety: HL: Notable vs. TFPM: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HL: 97% vs. TFPM: 105%
Market capitalization -- HL: $3.01B vs. TFPM: $2.91B
HL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.01B. TFPM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTFPM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TFPM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HL and TFPM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFPM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TFPM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the short-term than TFPM.

Price Growth

HL (@Precious Metals) experienced а +5.86% price change this week, while TFPM (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

HL is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

TFPM is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.51% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HL($3.01B) and TFPM($2.91B) have the same market capitalization . HL has higher P/E ratio than TFPM: HL (1111.11) vs TFPM (81.89). HL YTD gains are higher at: 17.719 vs. TFPM (8.378). HL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 124M vs. TFPM (109M). HL has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. TFPM (31.3M). TFPM has less debt than HL: TFPM (59.1M) vs HL (663M). HL has higher revenues than TFPM: HL (720M) vs TFPM (204M).
HLTFPMHL / TFPM
Capitalization3.01B2.91B103%
EBITDA124M109M114%
Gain YTD17.7198.378212%
P/E Ratio1111.1181.891,357%
Revenue720M204M353%
Total Cash106M31.3M339%
Total Debt663M59.1M1,122%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HL: Fundamental Ratings
HL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
22
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
59
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLTFPM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DRMCX6.350.09
+1.44%
Virtus Silvant Mid-Cap Growth Inst
EPLPX21.850.18
+0.83%
NYLI Epoch U.S. Equity Yield Class A
TRSGX40.200.29
+0.73%
T. Rowe Price Spectrum Mod Gr Allc
CIREX71.100.39
+0.55%
American Funds Capital Income Bldr 529E
HWCIX30.05N/A
N/A
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value I

HL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HL has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HL jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HL
1D Price
Change %
HL100%
+5.28%
PAAS - HL
85%
Closely correlated
+6.78%
FSM - HL
84%
Closely correlated
+8.14%
CDE - HL
83%
Closely correlated
+7.70%
MAG - HL
82%
Closely correlated
+6.75%
AG - HL
80%
Closely correlated
+8.12%
More

TFPM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TFPM has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TFPM jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TFPM
1D Price
Change %
TFPM100%
+4.09%
WPM - TFPM
70%
Closely correlated
+4.43%
PAAS - TFPM
70%
Closely correlated
+6.78%
SAND - TFPM
69%
Closely correlated
+3.12%
HL - TFPM
69%
Closely correlated
+5.28%
GOLD - TFPM
68%
Closely correlated
+3.82%
More