HLAGF
Price
$152.24
Change
+$2.50 (+1.67%)
Updated
May 6 closing price
Capitalization
25.58B
ICTEF
Price
$6.95
Change
-$0.01 (-0.14%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
13.97B
Ad is loading...

HLAGF vs ICTEF

Header iconHLAGF vs ICTEF Comparison
Open Charts HLAGF vs ICTEFBanner chart's image
Hapag-Lloyd Aktien
Price$152.24
Change+$2.50 (+1.67%)
Volume$6
Capitalization25.58B
International Container Terminal Services
Price$6.95
Change-$0.01 (-0.14%)
Volume$479
Capitalization13.97B
HLAGF vs ICTEF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HLAGF vs. ICTEF commentary
May 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLAGF is a Hold and ICTEF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 11, 2025
Stock price -- (HLAGF: $152.24 vs. ICTEF: $6.95)
Brand notoriety: HLAGF and ICTEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLAGF: 9% vs. ICTEF: 11%
Market capitalization -- HLAGF: $25.58B vs. ICTEF: $13.97B
HLAGF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $25.58B. ICTEF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $13.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $30.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLAGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileICTEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HLAGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ICTEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLAGF is a better buy in the long-term than ICTEF.

Price Growth

HLAGF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +0.82% price change this week, while ICTEF (@Marine Shipping) price change was +11.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +1.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+1.08% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLAGF($25.6B) has a higher market cap than ICTEF($14B). ICTEF has higher P/E ratio than HLAGF: ICTEF (16.39) vs HLAGF (9.92). ICTEF YTD gains are higher at: 6.923 vs. HLAGF (-2.096). HLAGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.36B vs. ICTEF (1.87B). HLAGF has more cash in the bank: 6.72B vs. ICTEF (1.25B). ICTEF has less debt than HLAGF: ICTEF (4.16B) vs HLAGF (5.76B). HLAGF has higher revenues than ICTEF: HLAGF (17.9B) vs ICTEF (2.91B).
HLAGFICTEFHLAGF / ICTEF
Capitalization25.6B14B183%
EBITDA4.36B1.87B234%
Gain YTD-2.0966.923-30%
P/E Ratio9.9216.3961%
Revenue17.9B2.91B616%
Total Cash6.72B1.25B538%
Total Debt5.76B4.16B139%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HLAGF: Fundamental Ratings
HLAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
84
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78
SMR RATING
1..100
76
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CCRV19.260.16
+0.82%
iShares® Commodity Curve Carry Strat ETF
FDD14.620.10
+0.69%
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Income Fund
JHS11.350.01
+0.09%
John Hancock Income Securities Trust Capital Stock
FCOM57.060.03
+0.05%
Fidelity MSCI Communication ServicesETF
SAY25.53-0.01
-0.04%
Saratoga Investment Corp

HLAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLAGF has been loosely correlated with HPGLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLAGF jumps, then HPGLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLAGF
1D Price
Change %
HLAGF100%
N/A
HPGLY - HLAGF
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.74%
MPZZF - HLAGF
33%
Loosely correlated
+7.67%
ZIM - HLAGF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
AMKBY - HLAGF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
AMKBF - HLAGF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.77%
More

ICTEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ICTEF and HPGLY have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ICTEF and HPGLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICTEF
1D Price
Change %
ICTEF100%
-0.14%
HPGLY - ICTEF
16%
Poorly correlated
-2.74%
HLAGF - ICTEF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GTMAY - ICTEF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KAKKF - ICTEF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HHULF - ICTEF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More