HLAGF
Price
$158.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
ZIM
Price
$20.98
Change
-$0.19 (-0.90%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
26 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HLAGF vs ZIM

Header iconHLAGF vs ZIM Comparison
Open Charts HLAGF vs ZIMBanner chart's image
Hapag-Lloyd Aktien
Price$158.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$528
CapitalizationN/A
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
Price$20.98
Change-$0.19 (-0.90%)
Volume$3.01M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
HLAGF vs ZIM Comparison Chart
Loading...
ZIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
HLAGF vs. ZIM commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLAGF is a Buy and ZIM is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (HLAGF: $152.17 vs. ZIM: $20.98)
Brand notoriety: HLAGF and ZIM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLAGF: 36% vs. ZIM: 49%
Market capitalization -- HLAGF: $32.04B vs. ZIM: $3.09B
HLAGF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $32.04B. ZIM’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $3.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $33.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $5.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLAGF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileZIM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HLAGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ZIM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZIM is a better buy in the long-term than HLAGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ZIM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ZIM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

HLAGF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -3.69% price change this week, while ZIM (@Marine Shipping) price change was +12.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

ZIM is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-0.26% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLAGF($32B) has a higher market cap than ZIM($3.09B). ZIM YTD gains are higher at: 125.799 vs. HLAGF (-2.978). HLAGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.2B vs. ZIM (-437.3M). HLAGF has more cash in the bank: 6.42B vs. ZIM (1.59B). ZIM (5.6B) and HLAGF (5.78B) have identical debt. HLAGF has higher revenues than ZIM: HLAGF (16.7B) vs ZIM (5.97B).
HLAGFZIMHLAGF / ZIM
Capitalization32B3.09B1,036%
EBITDA3.2B-437.3M-731%
Gain YTD-2.978125.799-2%
P/E Ratio35.93N/A-
Revenue16.7B5.97B280%
Total Cash6.42B1.59B404%
Total Debt5.78B5.6B103%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HLAGF: Fundamental Ratings
HLAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
19
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
74
SMR RATING
1..100
84
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ZIM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ZIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME21.660.39
+1.83%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X67612.720000571.609400
+0.85%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA221.331.76
+0.80%
Tesla
SPY582.302.52
+0.43%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL231.78-2.07
-0.89%
Apple

HLAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLAGF has been loosely correlated with HPGLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLAGF jumps, then HPGLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLAGF
1D Price
Change %
HLAGF100%
N/A
HPGLY - HLAGF
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MPZZF - HLAGF
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
ZIM - HLAGF
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
AMKBY - HLAGF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
MSLOF - HLAGF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More