Advertisement
HLDCY vs HLDVF
To understand the difference between Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. - ADR (HLDCY) vs. Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. (HLDVF) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HLDCY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHLDVF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- HLDCY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HLDVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HLDCY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLDVF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HLDCY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- HLDVF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HLDCY (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -2.01% price change this week, while HLDVF (@Real Estate Development) price change was -13.16% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.34%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Development (+0.14% weekly)Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
| HLDCY | HLDVF | HLDCY / HLDVF | |
| Capitalization | 14.9B | 14.9B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 12.4B | 14.3B | 87% |
| Gain YTD | 15.932 | 10.000 | 159% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.12 | 11.83 | 102% |
| Revenue | 25.6B | 24.2B | 106% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 13.9B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 96.5B | - |
HLDCY | HLDVF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 91 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 40 Fair valued | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HLDVF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as HLDCY (40). This means that HLDVF’s stock grew similarly to HLDCY’s over the last 12 months.
HLDCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as HLDVF (100). This means that HLDCY’s stock grew similarly to HLDVF’s over the last 12 months.
HLDVF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as HLDCY (99). This means that HLDVF’s stock grew similarly to HLDCY’s over the last 12 months.
HLDCY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as HLDVF (47). This means that HLDCY’s stock grew similarly to HLDVF’s over the last 12 months.
HLDCY's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as HLDVF (11). This means that HLDCY’s stock grew similarly to HLDVF’s over the last 12 months.
| HLDCY | HLDVF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 42% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 33% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 36% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 35% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 38% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 14 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 64% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 41% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TARK | 61.48 | 2.30 | +3.88% |
| Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF | |||
| FJP | 62.48 | 1.11 | +1.81% |
| First Trust Japan AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| SLVR | 32.37 | 0.47 | +1.47% |
| Sprott Silver Mnrs & Physical Silver ETF | |||
| SCHV | 27.85 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Schwab US Large-Cap Value ETF™ | |||
| TPYP | 35.21 | -0.22 | -0.62% |
| Tortoise North American Pipeline | |||
HLDCY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLDCY has been loosely correlated with SUHJY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLDCY jumps, then SUHJY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLDCY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLDCY | 100% | -1.72% | ||
| SUHJY - HLDCY | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.01% | ||
| HLPPY - HLDCY | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| LGFRY - HLDCY | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| BEKE - HLDCY | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| HYSNY - HLDCY | 40% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
HLDVF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLDVF has been loosely correlated with KOJAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLDVF jumps, then KOJAF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLDVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLDVF | 100% | N/A | ||
| KOJAF - HLDVF | 41% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| FHRT - HLDVF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HLDCY - HLDVF | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.72% | ||
| HNLGY - HLDVF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HOOB - HLDVF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||