Ad is loading...
HLEMX vs RNWAX
HLEMX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts HLEMX vs RNWAX
Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Advisor
Price$37.56
Change+$0.61 (+1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets440.94M
American Funds New World R1
Price$77.65
Change+$1.47 (+1.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.63B
HLEMX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLEMX vs. RNWAX commentary
May 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLEMX is a StrongBuy and RNWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 62.6B vs. HLEMX (441M). HLEMX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: HLEMX (1.56) vs RNWAX (0.00). HLEMX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: HLEMX (27 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than HLEMX (1.14). RNWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. HLEMX (32.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLEMX: RNWAX (250) vs HLEMX (5000). RNWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.95 vs. HLEMX (-7.34). RNWAX return over 5 years is better than : 36.75 vs. HLEMX (-14.82).
| HLEMX | RNWAX | HLEMX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.66 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.66 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.011 | 5.460 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 441M | 62.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.34 | 3.95 | -186% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.23 | 15.71 | -103% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.82 | 36.75 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | -17.07 | 43.56 | -39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...