Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLEMX vs RNWBX
HLEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HLEMX vs RNWBX
Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Advisor
Price$38.74
Change-$0.28 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets421.11M
American Funds New World R2
Price$81.27
Change-$0.46 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.26B
HLEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLEMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jun 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLEMX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 67.3B vs. HLEMX (421M). HLEMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HLEMX (1.51) vs RNWBX (0.13). HLEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HLEMX (27 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than HLEMX (1.14). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. HLEMX (32.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLEMX: RNWBX (250) vs HLEMX (5000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.73 vs. HLEMX (-3.45). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.80 vs. HLEMX (-19.95).
| HLEMX | RNWBX | HLEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.67 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.67 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.001 | 10.496 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 421M | 67.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 0.13 | 1,119% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.45 | 5.73 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.88 | 30.46 | -29% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.95 | 24.80 | -80% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.08 | 50.20 | -22% |