Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLEMX vs RNWBX
HLEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HLEMX vs RNWBX
Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Advisor
Price$43.85
Change+$0.16 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets446.02M
American Funds New World R2
Price$89.61
Change+$0.45 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.72B
HLEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLEMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLEMX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 73.7B vs. HLEMX (446M). HLEMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HLEMX (1.38) vs RNWBX (0.13). HLEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HLEMX (27 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than HLEMX (1.14). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. HLEMX (32.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLEMX: RNWBX (250) vs HLEMX (5000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.12 vs. HLEMX (4.48). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 23.93 vs. HLEMX (-19.40).
| HLEMX | RNWBX | HLEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.67 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.67 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.801 | 21.224 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 446M | 73.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.13 | 1,102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.48 | 15.12 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.37 | 45.18 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.40 | 23.93 | -81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.63 | 87.45 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers