Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLEMX vs RNWBX
HLEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HLEMX vs RNWBX
Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Advisor
Price$41.26
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets430.28M
American Funds New World R2
Price$85.40
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.58B
HLEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLEMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLEMX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. HLEMX (430M). HLEMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HLEMX (1.44) vs RNWBX (0.13). HLEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HLEMX (27 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than HLEMX (1.14). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. HLEMX (32.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLEMX: RNWBX (250) vs HLEMX (5000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.86 vs. HLEMX (4.92). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 21.45 vs. HLEMX (-21.09).
| HLEMX | RNWBX | HLEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.67 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.67 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.082 | 16.111 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 430M | 70.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.13 | 1,118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.92 | 14.86 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.10 | 31.78 | -10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.09 | 21.45 | -98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.57 | 66.46 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers