Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLEMX vs RNWFX
HLEMX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts HLEMX vs RNWFX
Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Advisor
Price$41.26
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets430.28M
American Funds New World R5
Price$90.27
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.58B
HLEMX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLEMX vs. RNWFX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLEMX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. HLEMX (430M). HLEMX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: HLEMX (1.44) vs RNWFX (1.04). HLEMX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: HLEMX (27 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). HLEMX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. HLEMX (32.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLEMX: RNWFX (250) vs HLEMX (5000). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.22 vs. HLEMX (4.92). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.71 vs. HLEMX (-21.09).
| HLEMX | RNWFX | HLEMX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.62 | 184% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.62 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.082 | 16.839 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 430M | 70.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.04 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.92 | 16.22 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.10 | 34.79 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.09 | 26.71 | -79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.57 | 74.60 | 3% |