Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLEMX vs RNWHX
HLEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts HLEMX vs RNWHX
Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Advisor
Price$39.09
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets443.17M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$85.04
Change+$0.19 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.63B
HLEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLEMX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 67.6B vs. HLEMX (443M). HLEMX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: HLEMX (1.51) vs RNWHX (1.04). HLEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: HLEMX (27 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). HLEMX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. HLEMX (32.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLEMX: RNWHX (250) vs HLEMX (5000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. HLEMX (-2.65). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 30.14 vs. HLEMX (-21.28).
| HLEMX | RNWHX | HLEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.72 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.72 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.782 | 11.865 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 443M | 67.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.04 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.65 | 7.68 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.63 | 23.56 | -54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.28 | 30.14 | -71% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.10 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement