Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLEMX vs RNWHX
HLEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts HLEMX vs RNWHX
Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Advisor
Price$41.26
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets430.28M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$88.77
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.58B
HLEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLEMX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70.6B vs. HLEMX (430M). HLEMX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: HLEMX (1.44) vs RNWHX (1.00). HLEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: HLEMX (27 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). HLEMX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. HLEMX (32.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLEMX: RNWHX (250) vs HLEMX (5000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.05 vs. HLEMX (4.92). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 26.08 vs. HLEMX (-21.09).
| HLEMX | RNWHX | HLEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.72 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.72 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.082 | 16.772 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 430M | 70.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.00 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.92 | 16.05 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.10 | 34.44 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.09 | 26.08 | -81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.57 | N/A | - |