Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLEMX vs RNWHX
HLEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts HLEMX vs RNWHX
Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Advisor
Price$43.85
Change+$0.16 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets446.02M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$93.25
Change+$0.48 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.72B
HLEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLEMX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 73.7B vs. HLEMX (446M). HLEMX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: HLEMX (1.38) vs RNWHX (0.97). HLEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: HLEMX (27 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). HLEMX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. HLEMX (32.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLEMX: RNWHX (250) vs HLEMX (5000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.31 vs. HLEMX (4.48). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 28.65 vs. HLEMX (-19.40).
| HLEMX | RNWHX | HLEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.72 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.72 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.801 | 22.034 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 446M | 73.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 0.97 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.48 | 16.31 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.37 | 48.09 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.40 | 28.65 | -68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.63 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers