It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUSNA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USNA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
HLF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +4.69% price change this week, while USNA (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -2.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.11%.
HLF is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.
USNA is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
HLF | USNA | HLF / USNA | |
Capitalization | 1B | 933M | 108% |
EBITDA | 482M | 123M | 392% |
Gain YTD | -53.211 | -33.899 | 157% |
P/E Ratio | 6.42 | 14.53 | 44% |
Revenue | 5.06B | 921M | 550% |
Total Cash | 575M | 330M | 174% |
Total Debt | 2.77B | 8.06M | 34,338% |
HLF | USNA | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 7 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 81 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HLF's Valuation (67) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as USNA (85) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew similarly to USNA’s over the last 12 months.
HLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as USNA (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew similarly to USNA’s over the last 12 months.
HLF's SMR Rating (7) in the Food Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USNA (65) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than USNA’s over the last 12 months.
USNA's Price Growth Rating (81) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as HLF (84) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that USNA’s stock grew similarly to HLF’s over the last 12 months.
HLF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Food Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USNA (86) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than USNA’s over the last 12 months.
HLF | USNA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago51% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago65% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago64% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 1 day ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago68% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago67% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 13 days ago58% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago79% | 7 days ago67% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLF has been loosely correlated with USNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLF jumps, then USNA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HLF | 100% | +0.42% | ||
USNA - HLF | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.77% | ||
CENTA - HLF | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.49% | ||
CENT - HLF | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.39% | ||
CAG - HLF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
FRPT - HLF | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.52% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USNA has been loosely correlated with AJINF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USNA jumps, then AJINF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To USNA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
USNA | 100% | -1.77% | ||
AJINF - USNA | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
CENT - USNA | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
CENTA - USNA | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
HAIN - USNA | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
HLF - USNA | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.42% | ||
More |