Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLFMX vs RNWBX
HLFMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts HLFMX vs RNWBX
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerg Mkts Inst
Price$8.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.52M
American Funds New World R2
Price$84.59
Change-$0.47 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.96B
HLFMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HLFMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLFMX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 70B vs. HLFMX (136M). HLFMX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: HLFMX (1.73) vs RNWBX (0.13). HLFMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: HLFMX (17 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than HLFMX (1.41). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. HLFMX (16.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLFMX: RNWBX (250) vs HLFMX (500000). HLFMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.60 vs. RNWBX (8.23). HLFMX return over 5 years is better than : 42.37 vs. RNWBX (23.25).
| HLFMX | RNWBX | HLFMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.67 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 1.67 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.746 | 15.010 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 136M | 70B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 0.13 | 1,353% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.60 | 8.23 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.40 | 38.23 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.37 | 23.25 | 182% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.82 | 60.30 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement