HLLGY
Price
$50.18
Change
-$0.61 (-1.20%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
10.94B
IOCJY
Price
$0.95
Change
+$0.10 (+11.76%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
385.02M
68 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

HLLGY vs IOCJY

Header iconHLLGY vs IOCJY Comparison
Open Charts HLLGY vs IOCJYBanner chart's image
Hella Gmbh & Co Kgaa
Price$50.18
Change-$0.61 (-1.20%)
Volume$100
Capitalization10.94B
Iochpe-Maxion SA
Price$0.95
Change+$0.10 (+11.76%)
Volume$6K
Capitalization385.02M
HLLGY vs IOCJY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HLLGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IOCJY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HLLGY vs. IOCJY commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLLGY is a Hold and IOCJY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (HLLGY: $50.18 vs. IOCJY: $0.95)
Brand notoriety: HLLGY and IOCJY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLLGY: 70% vs. IOCJY: 98%
Market capitalization -- HLLGY: $10.94B vs. IOCJY: $385.02M
HLLGY [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $10.94B. IOCJY’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $385.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $88.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLLGY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIOCJY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HLLGY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IOCJY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IOCJY is a better buy in the long-term than HLLGY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HLLGY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IOCJY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HLLGY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • IOCJY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IOCJY is a better buy in the short-term than HLLGY.

Price Growth

HLLGY (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IOCJY (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +3.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

IOCJY is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+3.40% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLLGY($10.9B) has a higher market cap than IOCJY($385M). HLLGY has higher P/E ratio than IOCJY: HLLGY (49.56) vs IOCJY (8.41). IOCJY YTD gains are higher at: 76.632 vs. HLLGY (9.035). IOCJY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.65B vs. HLLGY (936M). IOCJY has more cash in the bank: 1.68B vs. HLLGY (1.32B). HLLGY has less debt than IOCJY: HLLGY (938M) vs IOCJY (5.6B). IOCJY has higher revenues than HLLGY: IOCJY (15.9B) vs HLLGY (7.97B).
HLLGYIOCJYHLLGY / IOCJY
Capitalization10.9B385M2,831%
EBITDA936M1.65B57%
Gain YTD9.03576.63212%
P/E Ratio49.568.41589%
Revenue7.97B15.9B50%
Total Cash1.32B1.68B78%
Total Debt938M5.6B17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HLLGY vs IOCJY: Fundamental Ratings
HLLGY
IOCJY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3328
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
669
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5237
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IOCJY's Valuation (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLLGY (51). This means that IOCJY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLLGY’s over the last 12 months.

HLLGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IOCJY (69). This means that HLLGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than IOCJY’s over the last 12 months.

HLLGY's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IOCJY (100). This means that HLLGY’s stock grew similarly to IOCJY’s over the last 12 months.

IOCJY's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as HLLGY (52). This means that IOCJY’s stock grew similarly to HLLGY’s over the last 12 months.

IOCJY's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HLLGY (100). This means that IOCJY’s stock grew similarly to HLLGY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLLGYIOCJY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
23%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HLLGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IOCJY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JCHI54.290.68
+1.26%
JPMorgan Active China ETF
GLOW29.150.11
+0.36%
VictoryShares WestEnd Global Equity ETF
IYY158.440.56
+0.35%
iShares Dow Jones US ETF
EJAN32.790.05
+0.15%
Innovator Emerging Mkt Pwr Buff ETF™ Jan
GBAB15.45-0.03
-0.19%
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal

HLLGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLLGY and FURCF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLLGY and FURCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLLGY
1D Price
Change %
HLLGY100%
N/A
FURCF - HLLGY
13%
Poorly correlated
-4.26%
HLKHF - HLLGY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNZOY - HLLGY
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
EXCOF - HLLGY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IOCJY - HLLGY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IOCJY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IOCJY and JEHLY have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IOCJY and JEHLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IOCJY
1D Price
Change %
IOCJY100%
N/A
JEHLY - IOCJY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JELCF - IOCJY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLKHF - IOCJY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLLGY - IOCJY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FURCF - IOCJY
-0%
Poorly correlated
-4.26%
More