Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMCX vs MCDFX
HLMCX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts HLMCX vs MCDFX
Harding Loevner Chinese Equity Instl
Price$6.97
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.63M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.62
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
HLMCX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. HLMCX (3.63M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than HLMCX: MCDFX (2.78) vs HLMCX (0.88). HLMCX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: HLMCX (5 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). HLMCX (4.12) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. HLMCX (31.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMCX: MCDFX (2500) vs HLMCX (100000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.40 vs. HLMCX (13.16).
| HLMCX | MCDFX | HLMCX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.32 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.12 | 1.32 | 312% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.509 | 34.935 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.63M | 104M | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 2.78 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.16 | 17.40 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.09 | 39.93 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 2.19 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 48.17 | - |