Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMCX vs MCDFX
HLMCX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts HLMCX vs MCDFX
Harding Loevner Chinese Equity Instl
Price$6.65
Change-$0.01 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.43M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.13
Change-$0.08 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.42M
HLMCX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.4M vs. HLMCX (3.43M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than HLMCX: MCDFX (2.90) vs HLMCX (0.94). HLMCX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: HLMCX (5 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). HLMCX (4.12) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. HLMCX (31.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMCX: MCDFX (2500) vs HLMCX (100000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 52.20 vs. HLMCX (44.65).
| HLMCX | MCDFX | HLMCX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.32 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.12 | 1.32 | 312% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.472 | 30.786 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.43M | 99.4M | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 2.90 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.65 | 52.20 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.56 | 26.55 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 1.31 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement