Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMCX vs MCDFX
HLMCX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts HLMCX vs MCDFX
Harding Loevner Chinese Equity Instl
Price$6.08
Change+$0.05 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.16M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.12
Change+$0.09 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.69M
HLMCX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 95.7M vs. HLMCX (3.16M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than HLMCX: MCDFX (3.08) vs HLMCX (1.02). HLMCX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: HLMCX (5 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). HLMCX (4.12) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. HLMCX (31.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMCX: MCDFX (2500) vs HLMCX (100000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.52 vs. HLMCX (30.88).
| HLMCX | MCDFX | HLMCX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.32 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.12 | 1.32 | 312% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.774 | 21.277 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.16M | 95.7M | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 3.08 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.88 | 37.52 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.56 | 11.64 | -91% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -7.17 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 23.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement