Ad is loading...
HLMCX vs MCDFX
HLMCX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts HLMCX vs MCDFX
Harding Loevner Chinese Equity Instl
Price$5.13
Change+$0.03 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.67M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$12.19
Change+$0.08 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
HLMCX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. HLMCX (2.67M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than HLMCX: MCDFX (3.57) vs HLMCX (1.08). HLMCX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: HLMCX (4 years) vs MCDFX (15 years). HLMCX (3.81) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.17). HLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. MCDFX (27.30). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMCX: MCDFX (2500) vs HLMCX (100000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.75 vs. HLMCX (5.70).
| HLMCX | MCDFX | HLMCX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.17 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.81 | 1.17 | 326% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.774 | 4.826 | -78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67M | 93.9M | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 3.57 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.70 | 26.75 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | -23.58 | -7.04 | 335% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -2.73 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -0.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...