Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMCX vs MCDFX
HLMCX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts HLMCX vs MCDFX
Harding Loevner Chinese Equity Instl
Price$5.68
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.97M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$13.23
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
HLMCX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. HLMCX (2.97M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than HLMCX: MCDFX (3.62) vs HLMCX (1.08). HLMCX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: HLMCX (4 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). HLMCX (4.12) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. HLMCX (31.00). MCDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HLMCX: MCDFX (2500) vs HLMCX (100000). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.79 vs. HLMCX (8.81).
| HLMCX | MCDFX | HLMCX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.32 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.12 | 1.32 | 312% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.170 | 11.854 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.97M | 93.9M | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 3.62 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.81 | 18.79 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.91 | 0.68 | -2,637% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -5.16 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 0.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement