Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMCX vs TRCLX
HLMCX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts HLMCX vs TRCLX
Harding Loevner Chinese Equity Instl
Price$5.68
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.97M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.46
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.29M
HLMCX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 45.3M vs. HLMCX (2.97M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than HLMCX: TRCLX (1.69) vs HLMCX (1.08). HLMCX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: HLMCX (4 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). HLMCX (4.12) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. HLMCX (31.00). HLMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: HLMCX (100000) vs TRCLX (500000). HLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.81 vs. TRCLX (5.49).
| HLMCX | TRCLX | HLMCX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.03 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.12 | 2.10 | 196% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.170 | 8.617 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.97M | 45.3M | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.69 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.81 | 5.49 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.91 | -5.40 | 332% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -1.31 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement