Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMCX vs TRCLX
HLMCX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts HLMCX vs TRCLX
Harding Loevner Chinese Equity Instl
Price$6.08
Change+$0.05 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.16M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$12.76
Change+$0.18 (+1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.06M
HLMCX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 53.1M vs. HLMCX (3.16M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than HLMCX: TRCLX (1.56) vs HLMCX (1.02). HLMCX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: HLMCX (5 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). HLMCX (4.12) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. HLMCX (31.00). HLMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: HLMCX (100000) vs TRCLX (500000). HLMCX (30.88) and TRCLX (30.69) have marching annual gain over last year.
| HLMCX | TRCLX | HLMCX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.03 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.12 | 2.10 | 196% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.774 | 19.129 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.16M | 53.1M | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 1.56 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.88 | 30.69 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.56 | 6.87 | -154% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -5.86 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement