Ad is loading...
HLMCX vs TRCLX
HLMCX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts HLMCX vs TRCLX
Harding Loevner Chinese Equity Instl
Price$5.13
Change+$0.03 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.67M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$10.45
Change-$0.03 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.15M
HLMCX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 40.1M vs. HLMCX (2.67M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than HLMCX: TRCLX (1.68) vs HLMCX (1.08). HLMCX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: HLMCX (4 years) vs TRCLX (5 years). HLMCX (3.81) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. HLMCX (31.00). HLMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: HLMCX (100000) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.63 vs. HLMCX (5.70).
| HLMCX | TRCLX | HLMCX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.03 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.81 | 2.10 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.774 | 0.473 | -797% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67M | 40.1M | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.68 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.70 | 6.63 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | -23.58 | -9.86 | 239% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 3.86 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...