Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMCX vs TRCLX
HLMCX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts HLMCX vs TRCLX
Harding Loevner Chinese Equity Instl
Price$5.71
Change+$0.03 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.99M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.83
Change+$0.12 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.7M
HLMCX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 46.7M vs. HLMCX (2.99M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than HLMCX: TRCLX (1.61) vs HLMCX (1.07). HLMCX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: HLMCX (5 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). HLMCX (4.12) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. HLMCX (31.00). HLMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: HLMCX (100000) vs TRCLX (500000). HLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.39 vs. TRCLX (14.38).
| HLMCX | TRCLX | HLMCX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.03 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.12 | 2.10 | 196% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.736 | 12.027 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.99M | 46.7M | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.61 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.39 | 14.38 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | -21.69 | -8.08 | 269% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -3.76 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement