Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HLMCX vs TRCLX
HLMCX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts HLMCX vs TRCLX
Harding Loevner Chinese Equity Instl
Price$6.65
Change-$0.01 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.43M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.72
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.25M
HLMCX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 61.3M vs. HLMCX (3.43M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than HLMCX: TRCLX (1.39) vs HLMCX (0.94). HLMCX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: HLMCX (5 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). HLMCX (4.12) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. HLMCX (31.00). HLMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: HLMCX (100000) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.81 vs. HLMCX (44.65).
| HLMCX | TRCLX | HLMCX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.03 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.12 | 2.10 | 196% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.472 | 29.924 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.43M | 61.3M | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.39 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.65 | 47.81 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.56 | 20.27 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 1.47 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement