HLMMF
Price
$38.80
Change
+$1.30 (+3.47%)
Updated
Feb 27 closing price
Capitalization
6.26B
MNODF
Price
$15.65
Change
-$0.35 (-2.19%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

HLMMF vs MNODF

Header iconHLMMF vs MNODF Comparison
Open Charts HLMMF vs MNODFBanner chart's image
Holmen AB
Price$38.80
Change+$1.30 (+3.47%)
Volume$660
Capitalization6.26B
Mondi
Price$15.65
Change-$0.35 (-2.19%)
Volume$334
CapitalizationN/A
HLMMF vs MNODF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MNODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HLMMF vs. MNODF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMMF is a Hold and MNODF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (HLMMF: $38.80 vs. MNODF: $15.65)
Brand notoriety: HLMMF and MNODF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLMMF: 100% vs. MNODF: 43%
Market capitalization -- HLMMF: $6.26B vs. MNODF: $0
HLMMF [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $6.26B. MNODF’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $17.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLMMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMNODF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HLMMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MNODF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNODF is a better buy in the long-term than HLMMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNODF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MNODF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

HLMMF (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MNODF (@Pulp & Paper) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (+1.96% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNODF YTD gains are higher at: 12.915 vs. HLMMF (-7.575).
HLMMFMNODFHLMMF / MNODF
Capitalization6.26BN/A-
EBITDA8.75BN/A-
Gain YTD-7.57512.915-59%
P/E Ratio11.67N/A-
Revenue24.4BN/A-
Total Cash3.21BN/A-
Total Debt250MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNODF: Fundamental Ratings
MNODF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLMMFMNODF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
5%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ORN9.600.53
+5.84%
Orion Group Holdings
IVT27.460.13
+0.48%
InvenTrust Properties Corp
AIRT21.13N/A
N/A
Air T
GIGGU10.54N/A
N/A
GigCapital7 Corp
AYI305.38-0.64
-0.21%
Acuity Inc

HLMMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLMMF and SEOJF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLMMF and SEOJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLMMF
1D Price
Change %
HLMMF100%
N/A
SEOJF - HLMMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMKF - HLMMF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNODF - HLMMF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMMY - HLMMF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.02%
WBNEF - HLMMF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MNODF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNODF and POELF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNODF and POELF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNODF
1D Price
Change %
MNODF100%
N/A
POELF - MNODF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMKF - MNODF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMMY - MNODF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.02%
SLVM - MNODF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLMMF - MNODF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More