HLMMF
Price
$38.80
Change
+$1.30 (+3.47%)
Updated
Feb 27 closing price
Capitalization
5.93B
MNODF
Price
$15.00
Change
+$1.00 (+7.14%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.99B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HLMMF vs MNODF

Header iconHLMMF vs MNODF Comparison
Open Charts HLMMF vs MNODFBanner chart's image
Holmen AB
Price$38.80
Change+$1.30 (+3.47%)
Volume$660
Capitalization5.93B
Mondi
Price$15.00
Change+$1.00 (+7.14%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.99B
HLMMF vs MNODF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MNODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HLMMF vs. MNODF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMMF is a Hold and MNODF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (HLMMF: $38.80 vs. MNODF: $15.00)
Brand notoriety: HLMMF and MNODF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLMMF: 100% vs. MNODF: 30%
Market capitalization -- HLMMF: $5.93B vs. MNODF: $5.99B
HLMMF [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $5.93B. MNODF’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $5.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $14.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLMMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNODF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • HLMMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MNODF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNODF is a better buy in the long-term than HLMMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MNODF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MNODF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

HLMMF (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MNODF (@Pulp & Paper) price change was +7.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.61%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (+0.56% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNODF($5.99B) and HLMMF($5.93B) have the same market capitalization . MNODF has higher P/E ratio than HLMMF: MNODF (29.78) vs HLMMF (20.40). MNODF YTD gains are higher at: 8.225 vs. HLMMF (-7.575). HLMMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.05B vs. MNODF (982M). HLMMF has more cash in the bank: 324M vs. MNODF (168M). HLMMF has less debt than MNODF: HLMMF (234M) vs MNODF (2.81B). HLMMF has higher revenues than MNODF: HLMMF (22.7B) vs MNODF (7.59B).
HLMMFMNODFHLMMF / MNODF
Capitalization5.93B5.99B99%
EBITDA5.05B982M514%
Gain YTD-7.5758.225-92%
P/E Ratio20.4029.7868%
Revenue22.7B7.59B299%
Total Cash324M168M193%
Total Debt234M2.81B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MNODF: Fundamental Ratings
MNODF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
95
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
21
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLMMFMNODF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
7%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
5%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MNODF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VIGRX238.89N/A
N/A
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
BAUAX30.00N/A
N/A
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fdmtl Val Adv
GFCUX24.30N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity R6
FEIQX34.83N/A
N/A
Franklin Equity Income R6
RSMRX15.97N/A
N/A
RBC SMID Cap Growth R6

HLMMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLMMF and SEOJF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLMMF and SEOJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLMMF
1D Price
Change %
HLMMF100%
N/A
SEOJF - HLMMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMKF - HLMMF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNODF - HLMMF
6%
Poorly correlated
+7.14%
UPMMY - HLMMF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
WBNEF - HLMMF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MNODF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNODF and POELF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNODF and POELF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNODF
1D Price
Change %
MNODF100%
+7.14%
POELF - MNODF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMKF - MNODF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMMY - MNODF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
SLVM - MNODF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
HLMMF - MNODF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More