HLMMF
Price
$41.98
Change
+$2.08 (+5.21%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
6.26B
SEOJF
Price
$9.90
Change
+$0.15 (+1.54%)
Updated
Jan 10 closing price
Capitalization
9.54B
Ad is loading...

HLMMF vs SEOJF

Header iconHLMMF vs SEOJF Comparison
Open Charts HLMMF vs SEOJFBanner chart's image
Holmen AB
Price$41.98
Change+$2.08 (+5.21%)
Volume$100
Capitalization6.26B
Stora Enso Oyj
Price$9.90
Change+$0.15 (+1.54%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization9.54B
HLMMF vs SEOJF Comparison Chart
Loading...
SEOJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HLMMF vs. SEOJF commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMMF is a Hold and SEOJF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (HLMMF: $41.98 vs. SEOJF: $9.90)
Brand notoriety: HLMMF and SEOJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLMMF: 100% vs. SEOJF: 9%
Market capitalization -- HLMMF: $6.26B vs. SEOJF: $9.54B
HLMMF [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $6.26B. SEOJF’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $9.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $17.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLMMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSEOJF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HLMMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SEOJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HLMMF and SEOJF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SEOJF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SEOJF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

HLMMF (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SEOJF (@Pulp & Paper) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.05%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (+0.84% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SEOJF($9.54B) has a higher market cap than HLMMF($6.26B). HLMMF has higher P/E ratio than SEOJF: HLMMF (11.67) vs SEOJF (9.45). SEOJF YTD gains are higher at: 1.538 vs. HLMMF (0.000). HLMMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.75B vs. SEOJF (1.96B). HLMMF has more cash in the bank: 3.21B vs. SEOJF (1.97B). HLMMF has less debt than SEOJF: HLMMF (250M) vs SEOJF (5.13B). HLMMF has higher revenues than SEOJF: HLMMF (24.4B) vs SEOJF (10.9B).
HLMMFSEOJFHLMMF / SEOJF
Capitalization6.26B9.54B66%
EBITDA8.75B1.96B446%
Gain YTD0.0001.538-
P/E Ratio11.679.45123%
Revenue24.4B10.9B224%
Total Cash3.21B1.97B163%
Total Debt250M5.13B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SEOJF: Fundamental Ratings
SEOJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLMMFSEOJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
14%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
6%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SEOJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSNAX16.280.17
+1.06%
Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth A
STMGX31.490.15
+0.48%
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr Inv
MRSIX23.550.09
+0.38%
MFS Research International I
EDICX10.480.04
+0.38%
Eaton Vance Global Income Builder C
WSCJX13.500.04
+0.30%
Allspring Disciplined Small Cap R6

HLMMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLMMF and SEOJF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLMMF and SEOJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLMMF
1D Price
Change %
HLMMF100%
N/A
SEOJF - HLMMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMKF - HLMMF
8%
Poorly correlated
+5.93%
MNODF - HLMMF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMMY - HLMMF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
WBNEF - HLMMF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SEOJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SEOJF and HLMMF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SEOJF and HLMMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEOJF
1D Price
Change %
SEOJF100%
N/A
HLMMF - SEOJF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMMY - SEOJF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
UPMKF - SEOJF
4%
Poorly correlated
+5.93%
WBNEF - SEOJF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAGN - SEOJF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
More