HLMMF
Price
$38.80
Change
+$1.30 (+3.47%)
Updated
Feb 27 closing price
Capitalization
5.97B
UPMMY
Price
$26.85
Change
-$0.35 (-1.29%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
14.36B
Interact to see
Advertisement

HLMMF vs UPMMY

Header iconHLMMF vs UPMMY Comparison
Open Charts HLMMF vs UPMMYBanner chart's image
Holmen AB
Price$38.80
Change+$1.30 (+3.47%)
Volume$660
Capitalization5.97B
UPM-Kymmene
Price$26.85
Change-$0.35 (-1.29%)
Volume$94.02K
Capitalization14.36B
HLMMF vs UPMMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
UPMMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HLMMF vs. UPMMY commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMMF is a Hold and UPMMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (HLMMF: $38.80 vs. UPMMY: $26.85)
Brand notoriety: HLMMF and UPMMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLMMF: 100% vs. UPMMY: 94%
Market capitalization -- HLMMF: $5.97B vs. UPMMY: $14.36B
HLMMF [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $5.97B. UPMMY’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $14.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $14.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLMMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUPMMY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HLMMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UPMMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UPMMY is a better buy in the long-term than HLMMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

UPMMY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • UPMMY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

HLMMF (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UPMMY (@Pulp & Paper) price change was -0.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (-1.16% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UPMMY($14.4B) has a higher market cap than HLMMF($5.97B). UPMMY has higher P/E ratio than HLMMF: UPMMY (34.97) vs HLMMF (20.40). UPMMY YTD gains are higher at: 3.040 vs. HLMMF (-7.575). HLMMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.05B vs. UPMMY (1.6B). UPMMY has more cash in the bank: 740M vs. HLMMF (324M). HLMMF has less debt than UPMMY: HLMMF (234M) vs UPMMY (4.07B). HLMMF has higher revenues than UPMMY: HLMMF (22.7B) vs UPMMY (10.2B).
HLMMFUPMMYHLMMF / UPMMY
Capitalization5.97B14.4B41%
EBITDA5.05B1.6B315%
Gain YTD-7.5753.040-249%
P/E Ratio20.4034.9758%
Revenue22.7B10.2B223%
Total Cash324M740M44%
Total Debt234M4.07B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UPMMY: Fundamental Ratings
UPMMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
68
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
73
SMR RATING
1..100
88
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLMMFUPMMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
6%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
4%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
UPMMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCQGX98.57N/A
N/A
DWS Large Cap Focus Growth S
HMDCX26.12N/A
N/A
Hartford MidCap C
NOANX35.06N/A
N/A
Natixis Oakmark N
FXAIX231.17N/A
N/A
Fidelity 500 Index
EVDIX22.15N/A
N/A
Camelot Event Driven Institutional

HLMMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLMMF and SEOJF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLMMF and SEOJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLMMF
1D Price
Change %
HLMMF100%
N/A
SEOJF - HLMMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPMKF - HLMMF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNODF - HLMMF
6%
Poorly correlated
+5.68%
UPMMY - HLMMF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.28%
WBNEF - HLMMF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UPMMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UPMMY has been closely correlated with SEOAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UPMMY jumps, then SEOAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UPMMY
1D Price
Change %
UPMMY100%
-1.28%
SEOAY - UPMMY
70%
Closely correlated
-2.51%
UPMKF - UPMMY
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MONDY - UPMMY
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.21%
MERC - UPMMY
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.27%
SLVM - UPMMY
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
More