It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HLN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HLN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZTS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
HLN (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +0.83% price change this week, while ZTS (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +1.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.69%.
HLN is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2025.
ZTS is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
HLN | ZTS | HLN / ZTS | |
Capitalization | 38.4B | 77.5B | 50% |
EBITDA | 2.35B | 3.67B | 64% |
Gain YTD | 20.834 | -9.346 | -223% |
P/E Ratio | 29.23 | 32.94 | 89% |
Revenue | 11.3B | 8.54B | 132% |
Total Cash | 994M | 2.04B | 49% |
Total Debt | 9.46B | 6.76B | 140% |
ZTS | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HLN | ZTS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 3 days ago68% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago46% | 1 day ago60% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago50% | 1 day ago64% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago60% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago52% | 1 day ago63% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago52% | 1 day ago62% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% | 4 days ago62% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago47% | 8 days ago54% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% | 1 day ago48% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLN has been loosely correlated with HLNCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLN jumps, then HLNCF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HLN | 100% | +1.03% | ||
HLNCF - HLN | 49% Loosely correlated | +4.47% | ||
ZTS - HLN | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.26% | ||
BHC - HLN | 25% Poorly correlated | -8.89% | ||
ANIP - HLN | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.96% | ||
TAK - HLN | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.74% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZTS has been loosely correlated with SNDL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZTS jumps, then SNDL could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ZTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ZTS | 100% | +0.26% | ||
SNDL - ZTS | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.61% | ||
ACET - ZTS | 31% Poorly correlated | -3.77% | ||
EVO - ZTS | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.64% | ||
HLN - ZTS | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.03% | ||
ORGO - ZTS | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
More |