HLNE
Price
$150.26
Change
+$0.67 (+0.45%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.5B
15 days until earnings call
JBARF
Price
$66.64
Change
+$2.61 (+4.08%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
14.48B
Ad is loading...

HLNE vs JBARF

Header iconHLNE vs JBARF Comparison
Open Charts HLNE vs JBARFBanner chart's image
Hamilton Lane
Price$150.26
Change+$0.67 (+0.45%)
Volume$457.87K
Capitalization4.5B
Julius Baer Group
Price$66.64
Change+$2.61 (+4.08%)
Volume$144
Capitalization14.48B
HLNE vs JBARF Comparison Chart
Loading...
HLNE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JBARF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HLNE vs. JBARF commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLNE is a Hold and JBARF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (HLNE: $150.26 vs. JBARF: $66.64)
Brand notoriety: HLNE and JBARF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HLNE: 107% vs. JBARF: 30%
Market capitalization -- HLNE: $4.5B vs. JBARF: $14.48B
HLNE [@Investment Managers] is valued at $4.5B. JBARF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $14.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HLNE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJBARF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • HLNE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • JBARF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, JBARF is a better buy in the long-term than HLNE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HLNE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JBARF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HLNE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • JBARF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JBARF is a better buy in the short-term than HLNE.

Price Growth

HLNE (@Investment Managers) experienced а +7.51% price change this week, while JBARF (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

HLNE is expected to report earnings on May 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.49% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JBARF($14.5B) has a higher market cap than HLNE($4.5B). HLNE has higher P/E ratio than JBARF: HLNE (34.22) vs JBARF (12.22). HLNE YTD gains are higher at: 1.493 vs. JBARF (-0.105). HLNE has less debt than JBARF: HLNE (277M) vs JBARF (17.3B). JBARF has higher revenues than HLNE: JBARF (3.87B) vs HLNE (490M).
HLNEJBARFHLNE / JBARF
Capitalization4.5B14.5B31%
EBITDA271MN/A-
Gain YTD1.493-0.105-1,422%
P/E Ratio34.2212.22280%
Revenue490M3.87B13%
Total Cash164MN/A-
Total Debt277M17.3B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HLNE vs JBARF: Fundamental Ratings
HLNE
JBARF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2047
SMR RATING
1..100
2812
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5345
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
695
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

JBARF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLNE (66) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that JBARF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLNE’s over the last 12 months.

HLNE's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as JBARF (47) in the null industry. This means that HLNE’s stock grew similarly to JBARF’s over the last 12 months.

JBARF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as HLNE (28) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that JBARF’s stock grew similarly to HLNE’s over the last 12 months.

JBARF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as HLNE (53) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that JBARF’s stock grew similarly to HLNE’s over the last 12 months.

JBARF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLNE (69) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that JBARF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLNE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLNEJBARF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
34%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HLNE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JBARF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IWL147.581.66
+1.14%
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
DWUS49.820.56
+1.14%
AdvisorShares DW FSM US Core ETF
EIPX26.340.10
+0.40%
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF
FFLS23.320.07
+0.28%
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
SDP15.43-0.02
-0.13%
ProShares UltraShort Utilities

HLNE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLNE has been loosely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLNE jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLNE
1D Price
Change %
HLNE100%
+0.45%
APAM - HLNE
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
STEP - HLNE
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
VCTR - HLNE
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
BN - HLNE
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
JHG - HLNE
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.83%
More

JBARF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JBARF and JBAXY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JBARF and JBAXY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JBARF
1D Price
Change %
JBARF100%
+4.07%
JBAXY - JBARF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
SSSS - JBARF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.80%
JHG - JBARF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
HLNE - JBARF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
FNCSF - JBARF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
More