Advertisement
HLPMF vs STOHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLPMF is a Hold and STOHF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HLPMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTOHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HLPMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- STOHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
STOHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- STOHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HLPMF (@Integrated Oil) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while STOHF (@Integrated Oil) price change was -0.73% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +1.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.66%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Integrated Oil (+1.27% weekly)Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.
| HLPMF | STOHF | HLPMF / STOHF | |
| Capitalization | 3.08B | 65.2B | 5% |
| EBITDA | 473M | 41.9B | 1% |
| Gain YTD | 18.831 | 5.706 | 330% |
| P/E Ratio | 38.59 | 8.15 | 474% |
| Revenue | 11.4B | 106B | 11% |
| Total Cash | 766M | 23.8B | 3% |
| Total Debt | 3.36B | 34.3B | 10% |
STOHF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| HLPMF | STOHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 10% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 8% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 72% |
Advertisement
HLPMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HLPMF and WDGJF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLPMF and WDGJF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLPMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLPMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| WDGJF - HLPMF | 16% Poorly correlated | +15.63% | ||
| STOHF - HLPMF | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WDGJY - HLPMF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| UNTC - HLPMF | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.04% | ||
| TTFNF - HLPMF | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.40% | ||
More | ||||
STOHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STOHF has been loosely correlated with EQNR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STOHF jumps, then EQNR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STOHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STOHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| EQNR - STOHF | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| E - STOHF | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| OMVKY - STOHF | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
| SHEL - STOHF | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.07% | ||
| TTE - STOHF | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
More | ||||