HMDPF vs PHPPY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMDPF is a Hold and PHPPY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HMDPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePHPPY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HMDPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PHPPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
HMDPF (@Electrical Products) experienced а -7.83% price change this week, while PHPPY (@Electrical Products) price change was -2.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was +2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.81%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electrical Products (+2.21% weekly)The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.
| HMDPF | PHPPY | HMDPF / PHPPY | |
| Capitalization | 525M | 3.94B | 13% |
| EBITDA | 79.4M | 992M | 8% |
| Gain YTD | 61.757 | -23.904 | -258% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.44 | 13.55 | 99% |
| Revenue | 602M | 7.4B | 8% |
| Total Cash | 19.7M | 694M | 3% |
| Total Debt | 26M | 2.03B | 1% |
HMDPF | PHPPY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 94 | 27 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 91 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | 74 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 90 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PHPPY's Valuation (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HMDPF (66). This means that PHPPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HMDPF’s over the last 12 months.
HMDPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PHPPY (91). This means that HMDPF’s stock grew significantly faster than PHPPY’s over the last 12 months.
HMDPF's SMR Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PHPPY (74). This means that HMDPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PHPPY’s over the last 12 months.
HMDPF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as PHPPY (61). This means that HMDPF’s stock grew similarly to PHPPY’s over the last 12 months.
HMDPF's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as PHPPY (90). This means that HMDPF’s stock grew similarly to PHPPY’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
HMDPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HMDPF has been loosely correlated with HUBB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HMDPF jumps, then HUBB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HMDPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HMDPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| HUBB - HMDPF | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| NVT - HMDPF | 37% Loosely correlated | +2.41% | ||
| VRT - HMDPF | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.32% | ||
| AEIS - HMDPF | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.28% | ||
| LGRDY - HMDPF | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.01% | ||
More | ||||
PHPPY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PHPPY and LGRDY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PHPPY and LGRDY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PHPPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHPPY | 100% | N/A | ||
| LGRDY - PHPPY | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.01% | ||
| AEIS - PHPPY | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.28% | ||
| ENS - PHPPY | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.02% | ||
| HMDPF - PHPPY | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FCEL - PHPPY | 22% Poorly correlated | -5.19% | ||
More | ||||