Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMKAX vs TEAFX
HMKAX vs TEAFX Comparison
Open Charts HMKAX vs TEAFX
Hartford Sustainable Municipal Bond A
Price$10.06
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.63M
American Funds Tax-Exempt Bond F2
Price$12.45
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.51B
HMKAX vs TEAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMKAX vs. TEAFX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMKAX is a Hold and TEAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEAFX has more cash in the bank: 23.5B vs. HMKAX (73.6M). TEAFX pays higher dividends than HMKAX: TEAFX (3.28) vs HMKAX (2.82). HMKAX was incepted earlier than TEAFX: HMKAX (10 years) vs TEAFX (17 years). HMKAX (0.82) is less costly to investors than TEAFX (0.35). TEAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. HMKAX (23.00). TEAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMKAX: TEAFX (250) vs HMKAX (2000). HMKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.32 vs. TEAFX (-1.02). HMKAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.79 vs. TEAFX (-6.56).
| HMKAX | TEAFX | HMKAX / TEAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.35 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.35 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.329 | 0.484 | 481% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.6M | 23.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.82 | 3.28 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.32 | -1.02 | -129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.62 | 4.59 | 275% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.79 | -6.56 | -42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.21 | -0.50 | -4,817% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers