Ad is loading...
HMKAX vs TEAFX
HMKAX vs TEAFX Comparison
Open Charts HMKAX vs TEAFX
Hartford Sustainable Municipal Bond A
Price$9.94
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.82M
American Funds Tax-Exempt Bond F2
Price$12.32
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.17B
HMKAX vs TEAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMKAX vs. TEAFX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMKAX is a Hold and TEAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEAFX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. HMKAX (79.8M). TEAFX pays higher dividends than HMKAX: TEAFX (3.17) vs HMKAX (2.70). HMKAX was incepted earlier than TEAFX: HMKAX (10 years) vs TEAFX (17 years). HMKAX (0.82) is less costly to investors than TEAFX (0.35). TEAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. HMKAX (23.00). TEAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMKAX: TEAFX (250) vs HMKAX (2000). HMKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.82 vs. TEAFX (0.49). HMKAX return over 5 years is better than : 7.50 vs. TEAFX (-2.54).
| HMKAX | TEAFX | HMKAX / TEAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.35 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.35 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.086 | -0.565 | -15% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.8M | 24.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 3.17 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.82 | 0.49 | 574% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.19 | -2.53 | -166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.50 | -2.54 | -295% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -2.89 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers