Ad is loading...
HMKAX vs TEAFX
HMKAX vs TEAFX Comparison
Open Charts HMKAX vs TEAFX
Hartford Sustainable Municipal Bond A
Price$9.78
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.32M
American Funds Tax-Exempt Bond F2
Price$12.10
Change+$0.03 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.37B
HMKAX vs TEAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMKAX vs. TEAFX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMKAX is a Hold and TEAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEAFX has more cash in the bank: 23.4B vs. HMKAX (76.3M). TEAFX pays higher dividends than HMKAX: TEAFX (3.11) vs HMKAX (2.70). HMKAX was incepted earlier than TEAFX: HMKAX (10 years) vs TEAFX (17 years). HMKAX (0.82) is less costly to investors than TEAFX (0.35). TEAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. HMKAX (23.00). TEAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMKAX: TEAFX (250) vs HMKAX (2000). HMKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.77 vs. TEAFX (-0.58). HMKAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.33 vs. TEAFX (-4.87).
| HMKAX | TEAFX | HMKAX / TEAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.35 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.35 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.727 | -2.341 | 74% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.3M | 23.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 3.11 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.77 | -0.58 | -308% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.70 | -1.48 | -386% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.33 | -4.87 | -89% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -4.26 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...