Ad is loading...
HMKAX vs TEBCX
HMKAX vs TEBCX Comparison
Open Charts HMKAX vs TEBCX
Hartford Sustainable Municipal Bond A
Price$9.78
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.32M
American Funds Tax-Exempt Bond C
Price$12.10
Change+$0.03 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.37B
HMKAX vs TEBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMKAX vs. TEBCX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMKAX is a Hold and TEBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEBCX has more cash in the bank: 23.4B vs. HMKAX (76.3M). HMKAX pays higher dividends than TEBCX: HMKAX (2.70) vs TEBCX (2.17). HMKAX was incepted earlier than TEBCX: HMKAX (10 years) vs TEBCX (24 years). TEBCX (1.29) is less costly to investors than HMKAX (0.82). TEBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. HMKAX (23.00). TEBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMKAX: TEBCX (250) vs HMKAX (2000). HMKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.77 vs. TEBCX (-0.69). HMKAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.33 vs. TEBCX (-5.45).
| HMKAX | TEBCX | HMKAX / TEBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.29 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.29 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.727 | -2.341 | 74% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.3M | 23.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 2.17 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.77 | -0.69 | -258% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.70 | -1.69 | -337% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.33 | -5.45 | -79% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -5.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...