HMN
Price
$43.07
Change
-$0.39 (-0.90%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.49B
32 days until earnings call
SAFT
Price
$79.32
Change
-$0.48 (-0.60%)
Updated
Apr 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.22B
26 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HMN vs SAFT

Header iconHMN vs SAFT Comparison
Open Charts HMN vs SAFTBanner chart's image
Horace Mann Educators
Price$43.07
Change-$0.39 (-0.90%)
Volume$256.56K
Capitalization1.49B
Safety Insurance Group
Price$79.32
Change-$0.48 (-0.60%)
Volume$400
Capitalization1.22B
HMN vs SAFT Comparison Chart
Loading...
HMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HMN vs. SAFT commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMN is a Buy and SAFT is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (HMN: $43.07 vs. SAFT: $79.32)
Brand notoriety: HMN and SAFT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HMN: 125% vs. SAFT: 188%
Market capitalization -- HMN: $1.49B vs. SAFT: $1.22B
HMN [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $1.49B. SAFT’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAFT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SAFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HMN and SAFT are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HMN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAFT’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HMN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SAFT’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAFT is a better buy in the short-term than HMN.

Price Growth

HMN (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.12% price change this week, while SAFT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -0.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

HMN is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

SAFT is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.74% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMN($1.5B) has a higher market cap than SAFT($1.22B). SAFT has higher P/E ratio than HMN: SAFT (63.23) vs HMN (33.55). HMN YTD gains are higher at: 10.712 vs. SAFT (-2.586). HMN has more cash in the bank: 552M vs. SAFT (518M). SAFT has less debt than HMN: SAFT (49.8M) vs HMN (546M). HMN has higher revenues than SAFT: HMN (1.43B) vs SAFT (926M).
HMNSAFTHMN / SAFT
Capitalization1.5B1.22B123%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.712-2.586-414%
P/E Ratio33.5563.2353%
Revenue1.43B926M155%
Total Cash552M518M107%
Total Debt546M49.8M1,096%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HMN vs SAFT: Fundamental Ratings
HMN
SAFT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1477
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4246
SMR RATING
1..100
8975
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4249
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9398
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAFT's Valuation (22) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as HMN (32) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to HMN’s over the last 12 months.

HMN's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (46) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

SAFT's SMR Rating (75) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as HMN (89) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to HMN’s over the last 12 months.

HMN's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (49) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

HMN's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (98) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HMNSAFT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FGSRX125.26N/A
N/A
Franklin Growth R
DDDRX14.63N/A
N/A
Macquarie Wealth Builder R
IRVSX32.60N/A
N/A
Voya Russell Large Cap Value Idx Port S
FSLZX44.07N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selec Mid Cp Z
BTECX11.81N/A
N/A
Baron Technology Institutional

SAFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAFT has been loosely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAFT jumps, then L could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAFT
1D Price
Change %
SAFT100%
-0.60%
L - SAFT
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
UFCS - SAFT
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.76%
CNA - SAFT
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
CINF - SAFT
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
THG - SAFT
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.36%
More