HMRZF
Price
$12.14
Change
-$0.22 (-1.78%)
Updated
Apr 8 closing price
Capitalization
27.35B
SHOO
Price
$19.90
Change
+$0.36 (+1.84%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.14B
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HMRZF vs SHOO

Header iconHMRZF vs SHOO Comparison
Open Charts HMRZF vs SHOOBanner chart's image
Hennes & Mauritz AB
Price$12.14
Change-$0.22 (-1.78%)
Volume$520
Capitalization27.35B
Steven Madden
Price$19.90
Change+$0.36 (+1.84%)
Volume$1.47M
Capitalization3.14B
HMRZF vs SHOO Comparison Chart
Loading...
SHOO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HMRZF vs. SHOO commentary
Apr 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMRZF is a Hold and SHOO is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2025
Stock price -- (HMRZF: $12.14 vs. SHOO: $19.90)
Brand notoriety: HMRZF and SHOO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Apparel/Footwear industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HMRZF: 74% vs. SHOO: 79%
Market capitalization -- HMRZF: $27.35B vs. SHOO: $3.14B
HMRZF [@Apparel/Footwear] is valued at $27.35B. SHOO’s [@Apparel/Footwear] market capitalization is $3.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry ranges from $140.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry is $6.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HMRZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHOO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HMRZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SHOO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both HMRZF and SHOO are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SHOO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SHOO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

HMRZF (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SHOO (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was -6.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was -0.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

SHOO is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear (-0.99% weekly)

Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMRZF($27.3B) has a higher market cap than SHOO($3.14B). HMRZF has higher P/E ratio than SHOO: HMRZF (82.64) vs SHOO (18.44). HMRZF YTD gains are higher at: -7.961 vs. SHOO (-52.856). HMRZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 29.3B vs. SHOO (235M). HMRZF has more cash in the bank: 20.2B vs. SHOO (220M). SHOO has less debt than HMRZF: SHOO (139M) vs HMRZF (63.3B). HMRZF has higher revenues than SHOO: HMRZF (232B) vs SHOO (1.98B).
HMRZFSHOOHMRZF / SHOO
Capitalization27.3B3.14B870%
EBITDA29.3B235M12,468%
Gain YTD-7.961-52.85615%
P/E Ratio82.6418.44448%
Revenue232B1.98B11,705%
Total Cash20.2B220M9,182%
Total Debt63.3B139M45,540%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HMRZF vs SHOO: Fundamental Ratings
HMRZF
SHOO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9111
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98100
SMR RATING
1..100
4045
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7893
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8894
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HMRZF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as SHOO (18) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that HMRZF’s stock grew similarly to SHOO’s over the last 12 months.

HMRZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as SHOO (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that HMRZF’s stock grew similarly to SHOO’s over the last 12 months.

HMRZF's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as SHOO (45) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that HMRZF’s stock grew similarly to SHOO’s over the last 12 months.

HMRZF's Price Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as SHOO (93) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that HMRZF’s stock grew similarly to SHOO’s over the last 12 months.

HMRZF's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as SHOO (94) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that HMRZF’s stock grew similarly to SHOO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHOO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SHOO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ETCHX25.810.34
+1.33%
Eventide Healthcare & Life Sciences C
AMAFX9.270.11
+1.20%
American Century Small Cap Dividend I
FSEIX49.320.52
+1.07%
Nuveen Mid Cap Value 1 I
ANWPX58.560.31
+0.53%
American Funds New Perspective A
APHMX36.900.15
+0.41%
Artisan Mid Cap Institutional

HMRZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HMRZF and HNNMY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HMRZF and HNNMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HMRZF
1D Price
Change %
HMRZF100%
N/A
HNNMY - HMRZF
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.21%
MCRAB - HMRZF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GOOS - HMRZF
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.96%
SHOO - HMRZF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
COLM - HMRZF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
More

SHOO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOO has been closely correlated with PVH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHOO jumps, then PVH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHOO
1D Price
Change %
SHOO100%
+1.84%
PVH - SHOO
69%
Closely correlated
+1.74%
COLM - SHOO
68%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
OXM - SHOO
65%
Loosely correlated
+4.77%
SKX - SHOO
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.97%
CAL - SHOO
58%
Loosely correlated
+5.97%
More