Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMSFX vs SMFPX
HMSFX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMSFX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jun 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMSFX is a StrongBuy and SMFPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. HMSFX (80.4M). HMSFX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: HMSFX (8.19) vs SMFPX (3.50). HMSFX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: HMSFX (11 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than HMSFX (1.94). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. HMSFX (6.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMSFX: SMFPX (1000) vs HMSFX (2500). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.85 vs. HMSFX (18.77). HMSFX return over 5 years is better than : 194.78 vs. SMFPX (137.92).
| HMSFX | SMFPX | HMSFX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 2.12 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 2.15 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.050 | 1.016 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.4M | 1.25B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.19 | 3.50 | 234% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.77 | 21.85 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.12 | 47.83 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 194.78 | 137.92 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.28 | 18.86 | 219% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers