Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMSFX vs SMFPX
HMSFX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMSFX vs. SMFPX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMSFX is a Buy and SMFPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. HMSFX (75.2M). HMSFX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: HMSFX (8.51) vs SMFPX (3.42). HMSFX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: HMSFX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than HMSFX (1.94). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. HMSFX (6.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMSFX: SMFPX (1000) vs HMSFX (2500). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.22 vs. HMSFX (10.94). HMSFX return over 5 years is better than : 227.06 vs. SMFPX (154.28).
| HMSFX | SMFPX | HMSFX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 2.12 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 2.15 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.728 | 2.986 | -91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.2M | 1.25B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.51 | 3.42 | 249% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.94 | 14.22 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.79 | 54.94 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 227.06 | 154.28 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.16 | 55.81 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement