Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMSIX vs RMLPX
HMSIX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMSIX vs. RMLPX commentary
Aug 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMSIX is a Hold and RMLPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. HMSIX (76.4M). HMSIX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: HMSIX (8.03) vs RMLPX (5.15). HMSIX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: HMSIX (12 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). HMSIX (1.54) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). RMLPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. HMSIX (6.00). RMLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMSIX: RMLPX (2500) vs HMSIX (250000). HMSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.21 vs. RMLPX (8.88). RMLPX (211.35) and HMSIX (203.07) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HMSIX | RMLPX | HMSIX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.10 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.10 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.147 | 4.134 | -52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2500 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.4M | 1.14B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.03 | 5.15 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.21 | 8.88 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.87 | 55.00 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 203.07 | 211.35 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.73 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement