Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMSIX vs RMLPX
HMSIX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMSIX vs. RMLPX commentary
Sep 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMSIX is a Buy and RMLPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. HMSIX (77.5M). HMSIX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: HMSIX (8.08) vs RMLPX (5.04). HMSIX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: HMSIX (12 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). HMSIX (1.54) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). RMLPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. HMSIX (6.00). RMLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMSIX: RMLPX (2500) vs HMSIX (250000). HMSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.79 vs. RMLPX (8.41). RMLPX (243.64) and HMSIX (238.25) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HMSIX | RMLPX | HMSIX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.10 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.10 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.507 | 7.497 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2500 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 77.5M | 1.2B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.08 | 5.04 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.79 | 8.41 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.72 | 61.11 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 238.25 | 243.64 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.95 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement