Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMSIX vs RMLPX
HMSIX vs RMLPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMSIX vs. RMLPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMSIX is a Hold and RMLPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMLPX has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. HMSIX (73.9M). HMSIX pays higher dividends than RMLPX: HMSIX (8.66) vs RMLPX (5.21). HMSIX was incepted earlier than RMLPX: HMSIX (12 years) vs RMLPX (8 years). HMSIX (1.54) is less costly to investors than RMLPX (1.10). RMLPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. HMSIX (6.00). RMLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMSIX: RMLPX (2500) vs HMSIX (250000). RMLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.31 vs. HMSIX (-2.40). RMLPX return over 5 years is better than : 232.54 vs. HMSIX (203.70).
| HMSIX | RMLPX | HMSIX / RMLPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.10 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.10 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.404 | 9.757 | -14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2500 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.9M | 1.18B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.66 | 5.21 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.40 | 2.31 | -104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.13 | 56.60 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 203.70 | 232.54 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement