Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HMSIX vs SMFPX
HMSIX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMSIX vs. SMFPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMSIX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.23B vs. HMSIX (73.9M). HMSIX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: HMSIX (8.66) vs SMFPX (3.55). HMSIX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: HMSIX (12 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than HMSIX (1.54). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. HMSIX (6.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMSIX: SMFPX (1000) vs HMSIX (250000). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.71 vs. HMSIX (-2.40). HMSIX return over 5 years is better than : 203.70 vs. SMFPX (142.73).
| HMSIX | SMFPX | HMSIX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 2.12 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 2.15 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.404 | 3.154 | -45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 1000 | 25,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.9M | 1.23B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.66 | 3.55 | 244% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.40 | 0.71 | -340% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.13 | 52.05 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 203.70 | 142.73 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.47 | 95.65 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement