Ad is loading...
HMSIX vs SMFPX
HMSIX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMSIX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMSIX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.33B vs. HMSIX (85.1M). HMSIX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: HMSIX (8.63) vs SMFPX (4.75). HMSIX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: HMSIX (11 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. HMSIX (16.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMSIX: SMFPX (1000) vs HMSIX (250000). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 52.07 vs. HMSIX (49.30). HMSIX return over 5 years is better than : 117.12 vs. SMFPX (92.29).
| HMSIX | SMFPX | HMSIX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.098 | 9.047 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 1000 | 25,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85.1M | 1.33B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.63 | 4.75 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | 49.30 | 52.07 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 116.32 | 85.17 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 117.12 | 92.29 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.16 | 40.66 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...