Ad is loading...
HMSIX vs SMRPX
HMSIX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMSIX vs. SMRPX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMSIX is a Hold and SMRPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.33B vs. HMSIX (85.1M). HMSIX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: HMSIX (8.63) vs SMRPX (5.72). HMSIX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: HMSIX (11 years) vs SMRPX (9 years). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. HMSIX (16.00). HMSIX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: HMSIX (250000) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.74 vs. HMSIX (49.30). HMSIX return over 5 years is better than : 117.12 vs. SMRPX (102.85).
| HMSIX | SMRPX | HMSIX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.098 | 9.153 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 1000000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85.1M | 1.33B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.63 | 5.72 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 49.30 | 53.74 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 116.32 | 91.15 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 117.12 | 102.85 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.16 | N/A | - |