Ad is loading...
HMSIX vs SMRPX
HMSIX vs SMRPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HMSIX vs. SMRPX commentary
Apr 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMSIX is a StrongBuy and SMRPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. HMSIX (78.3M). HMSIX pays higher dividends than SMRPX: HMSIX (7.30) vs SMRPX (4.35). HMSIX was incepted earlier than SMRPX: HMSIX (11 years) vs SMRPX (9 years). HMSIX (1.65) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.06). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. HMSIX (6.00). HMSIX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: HMSIX (250000) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.43 vs. HMSIX (19.71). HMSIX return over 5 years is better than : 287.99 vs. SMRPX (198.56).
| HMSIX | SMRPX | HMSIX / SMRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 1.06 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 1.06 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.604 | -3.720 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 1000000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 78.3M | 1.2B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.30 | 4.35 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.71 | 21.43 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.07 | 44.51 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 287.99 | 198.56 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...