HMST
Price
$13.61
Change
-$0.36 (-2.58%)
Updated
Aug 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
257.7M
67 days until earnings call
MFDB
Price
$2.55
Change
+$0.16 (+6.69%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
Capitalization
8.5M
Interact to see
Advertisement

HMST vs MFDB

Header iconHMST vs MFDB Comparison
Open Charts HMST vs MFDBBanner chart's image
HomeStreet
Price$13.61
Change-$0.36 (-2.58%)
Volume$2.74K
Capitalization257.7M
Mutual Federal Ban
Price$2.55
Change+$0.16 (+6.69%)
Volume$7.5K
Capitalization8.5M
HMST vs MFDB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HMST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFDB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HMST vs. MFDB commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMST is a Buy and MFDB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (HMST: $13.97 vs. MFDB: $2.55)
Brand notoriety: HMST and MFDB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HMST: 161% vs. MFDB: 213%
Market capitalization -- HMST: $257.7M vs. MFDB: $8.5M
HMST [@Regional Banks] is valued at $257.7M. MFDB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $8.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HMST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMFDB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HMST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MFDB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HMST is a better buy in the long-term than MFDB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HMST’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFDB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HMST’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MFDB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HMST is a better buy in the short-term than MFDB.

Price Growth

HMST (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.60% price change this week, while MFDB (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

HMST is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMST($258M) has a higher market cap than MFDB($8.5M). HMST YTD gains are higher at: 22.329 vs. MFDB (-15.000). MFDB has less debt than HMST: MFDB (5M) vs HMST (1.27B). HMST has higher revenues than MFDB: HMST (55.5M) vs MFDB (6.69M).
HMSTMFDBHMST / MFDB
Capitalization258M8.5M3,035%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.329-15.000-149%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue55.5M6.69M829%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.27B5M25,300%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HMST vs MFDB: Fundamental Ratings
HMST
MFDB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1745
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9591
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4653
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFDB's Valuation (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HMST (88) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFDB’s stock grew significantly faster than HMST’s over the last 12 months.

MFDB's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HMST (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFDB’s stock grew similarly to HMST’s over the last 12 months.

MFDB's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as HMST (95) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFDB’s stock grew similarly to HMST’s over the last 12 months.

HMST's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MFDB (53) in the null industry. This means that HMST’s stock grew similarly to MFDB’s over the last 12 months.

HMST's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for MFDB (100) in the null industry. This means that HMST’s stock grew significantly faster than MFDB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HMSTMFDB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
80%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HMST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFDB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTXR1.370.05
+3.79%
Citius Pharmaceuticals Inc
NE28.690.68
+2.43%
Noble Corp
IRWD1.26-0.01
-0.79%
Ironwood Pharmaceuticals
CVNA367.35-4.85
-1.30%
Carvana Co
GERN1.41-0.05
-3.42%
Geron Corp

HMST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HMST has been loosely correlated with ALRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HMST jumps, then ALRS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HMST
1D Price
Change %
HMST100%
+0.36%
ALRS - HMST
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
SBNY - HMST
55%
Loosely correlated
-5.88%
CPF - HMST
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
PFS - HMST
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
MCBS - HMST
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
More

MFDB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFDB has been loosely correlated with AMFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MFDB jumps, then AMFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFDB
1D Price
Change %
MFDB100%
N/A
AMFC - MFDB
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FBSI - MFDB
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HMST - MFDB
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
SVBT - MFDB
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FTFI - MFDB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More